Do you trust Factcheck.org for your fact checking?

If you do, you might be interested to know this...

 

Factcheck.org and Barack Obama

 


On their website, it says the Annenberg Foundation strives to advance public well-being through improved communications. It’s basically a big, non-profit, community organization foundation.  Is anyone aware that factcheck.org is run by The Annenberg Foundation? Why should you be concerned about this?
In 1995, current Democratic Presidential Nominee Barack Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Annenberg Chicago Challenge, a branch of the Annenberg Foundation. Unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist, William Ayers co-chaired the Chicago Annenberg Collaborative, which set education policy for the Challenge. Obama was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative the development of collaborative projects and programs. Obama had to obtain assistance of the Collaborative in the development of requests for proposals. Obama had to seek advice from the Collaborative regarding the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Obama and Ayers, sat together on the board’s Governance Committee, and were part of a group of four instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern Chicago Annenberg Collaborative.

As Board Chair, Obama authorized the funding for Ayers’ educational projects, as well as projects of Ayers’ “radical” friends. Obama and Ayers raised money for ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now).
According to the Obama campaign, he and Ayers had a “tangential” relationship which seems to revolve around the Annenberg Foundation. In 2001, Obama and Ayers were still members of the Chicago Annenberg Foundation, Obama was Chairman while Ayers was touting his memoir, Fugitive Days, about his days spent “bombing” in the name of “change”.
In 2001, The New York Times interviewed William Ayers. It also happened to be printed on September 11. In that interview, Ayers said of his terrorist acts, ‘‘I don’t regret setting bombs,’’ and ‘‘I feel we didn’t do enough.’‘
 
http://politics.gearlive.com/filibustersoup/article/q308-factcheckorg-and-barack-obama/
 
William Ayers

 
 

 
 
 


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

14 Posted Answers
Order by

 
39 helpful answers

The Republicans and Independents are on the move to reclaim the country from the Socialists! In 2012 we kick out the Democrat's Messiah.

I don't know much about William Ayres except what has been generally printed about him and his involvment with the bombings and his lack remorse.

It just confirms what I have always thought that Obama is out to put people in charge of different political offices whom I would not trust as far as I can throw them.

It seems that most of these people have records that indicate they are out to destroy our system as it exists. They don't want to make the system better, they want to destroy it.

Posted 2009-11-28T18:08:39Z
 
279 helpful answers

Don't just rock the boat, turn it over, if you're not on it!

I guess they got their change on 9/11. Obama sure likes to fund criminals with his money. Their going to try an bring the United States to its knees.Surprised 

Posted 2009-11-29T02:19:29Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer
 
2051 helpful answers

Sure I do ! I also get my new fron the Daily Kos and the lame street media rag NY TIMES.They would lie now would they?

Undercover here are updates to links

http://www.factcheck.org/kerry_ad_falsely_accuses_cheney_on_halliburton.html

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/a_license_to_kill.html

Posted 2009-11-29T06:49:43Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer
 
6 helpful answers

democrat and proud of it. someone trying to learn about conservatism before it becomes extinct

First Posted: 11-11-09 12:03 PM   |   Updated: 11-11-09 12:26 PM

What's Your Reaction?





Amazing
Inspiring
Funny
Scary
Hot
Crazy
Important
Weird

Read More: Cable News Ratings , Evening News Ratings , Fox News , Fox News Ratings , Nightly News , Media News




3 Share
2
votes Buzz up!


Brian Shep



Get Breaking News Alerts

never spam


In one of the bigger news weeks this fall, with the the health care debate, the 2009 elections and the breaking news out of Fort Hood, Fox News and "NBC Nightly News" came out on top in the ratings.
Among cable news networks, Fox News was tops, averaging 2.556 million total viewers in primetime for the week and registering as the #3 cable network in primetime. CNN averaged 883,000 total viewers for the #21 spot on cable, while MSNBC averaged 741,000 total viewers for the #26 spot on cable.
In the total day, ratings Fox News placed 4th among all cable networks with an average of 1.402 million total viewers; CNN placed 20th with an average of 593,000 total viewers; MSNBC placed 33rd.
On the networks, "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams" averaged 9.469 million total viewers, its best week since the week of February 16, 2009. ABC's "World News" with Charles Gibson averaged 8.380 million total viewers, while the "CBS Evening News with Katie Couric" averaged 6.204 million total viewers. "Nightly News" was also the only network newscast to show growth compared to a year ago, adding 136,000 total viewers (2%) versus the same week last season.
In the A25-54 demographic, "Nightly" garnered a 2.3 rating, its highest in that demo since the week of March 23, 2009. "World News" got a 1.9 A25-54 rating, and "CBS Evening News" got a 1.5 A25-54 rating.

Cable Time Period Rank - Week of 11-2-09 _Live+SD_ -

Posted 2009-11-29T11:35:07Z
 
6 helpful answers

democrat and proud of it. someone trying to learn about conservatism before it becomes extinct

Report Says Bin Laden Was Within Reach

By CALVIN WOODWARD

,

AP



posted: 3 HOURS 52 MINUTES AGO
comments: 470
filed under: National News , Political News , World News


PRINT | E-MAIL MORE

Text Size A A A

WASHINGTON (Nov. 28) -- Osama bin Laden was unquestionably within reach of U.S. troops in the mountains of Tora Bora when American military leaders made the crucial and costly decision not to pursue the terrorist leader with massive force, a Senate report says.

The report asserts that the failure to kill or capture bin Laden at his most vulnerable in December 2001 has had lasting consequences beyond the fate of one man. Bin Laden's escape laid the foundation for today's reinvigorated Afghan insurgency and inflamed the internal strife now endangering Pakistan, it says.

Staff members for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Democratic majority prepared the report at the request of the chairman, Sen. John Kerry, as President Barack Obama prepares to boost U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

The Massachusetts senator and 2004 Democratic presidential candidate has long argued the Bush administration missed a chance to get the al-Qaida leader and top deputies when they were holed up in the forbidding mountainous area of eastern Afghanistan only three months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Although limited to a review of military operations eight years old, the report could also be read as a cautionary note for those resisting an increased troop presence there now.

More pointedly, it seeks to affix a measure of blame for the state of the war today on military leaders under former president George W. Bush, specifically Donald H. Rumsfeld as defense secretary and his top military commander, Tommy Franks.

"Removing the al-Qaida leader from the battlefield eight years ago would not have eliminated the worldwide extremist threat," the report says. "But the decisions that opened the door for his escape to Pakistan allowed bin Laden to emerge as a potent symbolic figure who continues to attract a steady flow of money and inspire fanatics worldwide. The failure to finish the job represents a lost opportunity that forever altered the course of the conflict in Afghanistan and the future of international terrorism."

The report states categorically that bin Laden was hiding in Tora Bora when the U.S. had the means to mount a rapid assault with several thousand troops at least. It says that a review of existing literature, unclassified government records and interviews with central participants "removes any lingering doubts and makes it clear that Osama bin Laden was within our grasp at Tora Bora."

On or about Dec. 16, 2001, bin Laden and bodyguards "walked unmolested out of Tora Bora and disappeared into Pakistan's unregulated tribal area," where he is still believed to be based, the report says.

Instead of a massive attack, fewer than 100 U.S. commandos, working with Afghan militias, tried to capitalize on air strikes and track down their prey.

"The vast array of American military power, from sniper teams to the most mobile divisions of the Marine Corps and the Army, was kept on the sidelines," the report said.

At the time, Rumsfeld expressed concern that a large U.S. troop presence might fuel a backlash and he and some others said the evidence was not conclusive about bin Laden's location.

Posted 2009-11-29T12:23:40Z
 
39 helpful answers

The Republicans and Independents are on the move to reclaim the country from the Socialists! In 2012 we kick out the Democrat's Messiah.

Osama Bin Laden was within reach when Bill Clinton was president. I forgot which country had him, but they offered to extradite him to the US and Bill Clinton (genius that he was) refused to accept the offer to take him back into the US. Guess he was too busy with Monica at the time. I think it was the Sudan that offered him. Clinton and Sandy (White House Burgler) Berger said "thanks, but no thanks." Of course, they may deny that.

Posted 2009-11-29T15:33:06Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer
 
90 helpful answers

"Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem.”

Philippians 4:13 "I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength."

Semper Fi

About as Much as I Trust Barney Frank to house-sit for me .... Laughing

Posted 2009-11-29T18:49:17Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer
 
90 helpful answers

"Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem.”

Philippians 4:13 "I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength."

Semper Fi

Freedomlover .... The Sudan has Osama bin Laden TWICE.

Remember, Clinton said Osama was a Criminal Threat, not a Terrorist Threat.  Very similar to how Obama is handling terrorists today.  We're not even allowed to call them terrorists anymore.

Clinton referred to Osama as a "hot potato"

Posted 2009-11-29T18:51:31Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Dawg? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

A falling out between Obama and Ayers??

An old friend -- Bill Ayers -- parts ways with Obama on Afghanistan Los Angeles Times - ‎Dec 3, 2009‎ Wow, I ...
Submitted by Dawg   2 months ago.
  • viewed 226 times
Last answer posted 1 month ago by finabiscotti


Q:

Pronunciation of Barack Obama's name

What is the correct pronunciation of Barack Obama's first name: BAH-rahk; bur-RAHK; BA-RACK; or something else?
Submitted by WenKroy   3 years ago.
  • viewed 4632 times
Last answer posted 1 year ago by emily517



» More...

Be The First To Answer

Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them

» More...
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License