Tippy, you're STILL missing the point.
The 3 major news networks are all falling over themselves to get "exclusives" while there with Obama.
I was mistaken, McCain has made EIGHT trips there and NOT ONE was covered by the networks.
There is a bias in the media (SURPRISE!!!!!!!) big time towards Obama, unlike any other election.
JFK was never derided as being inexperienced. He was too young and too Catholic, that is what the fear was. But, unlike Obama, while he was in the senate he DID things...he sponsored and co-sponsored legislation. Obama has done NEITHER. By the official records of Congress he is THE MOST liberal of all. Yes, even more liberal than Hillary.....THE MOST LIBERAL OF ALL.
Clinton's experience was never an issue either...he had run a State as governor.
WHAT has Obama ever done on a large scale that would prepare him for the Presidency....forget all the "change' verbiage. LOOK AT HIS RECORD. He has NO large scale successes or experience from which to draw upon.
I agree the country DOES need 'change'. It does not need the "throw more money at the problems" type changes that Obama is suggesting. That has never worked....look at the records of the Great Society, the education system, the prison system, the welfare system and social security. We need to change to get government LESS in our lives. Had there been less government our schools would be educating our kids not just warehousing them, a postage stamp would not cost 42 cents and gas would be in supply and not cost 4 dollars a gallon.
THAT is the kind of change we need.
Obama's change is, basically, building on failed, old programs...that is not 'change'. If you put vinegar on dog poop that is change but, it still stinks!
Vote for him if you'd like but be prepared for 2 things:
1. BOTH taxes and government will grow
2. He will be a one-term president (as will McCain).
