• Answers
  • Web
regret is full of missed opportunities.......

What do you think could be changed in our society?

What do you think could be changed in our society to make it better for everyone? more freedom of choice, less? better environment? more control less? any thoughts you have on how you think society could be better run?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

28 Posted Answers
Order by

 
516 helpful answers

I would return to the old time tested values of absolute right and wrong. The modern emphasis on relativism has left people confused and supporting negative movements, mainly the drive to be politically correct.

 
1 helpful answer

True freedom and justice is only available when each one of us receives our birthright. That is access to the earth and its bounty.

We presently own it privately and charge newcomers (babies and immigrants) as much as we can extort, to get their piece of the action.

While we can't all occupy the same space, we could (and should) pay a rent to the community foir the right to exclusive use of the land we want to occupy.  That rental fund could pay for the services required by those excluded.  The haves pay for their privilege, the have-nots receive their fair share for not gaining a privilege.  Absolutely just, and society will benefit all round.

Check out the Progress Report @:  www.progress.org

 

Helpful?(2)
Rated as Best Answer
 
7 helpful answers

I would love to see the world as it was originally meant to be - a world of perfection & peace in paradisaic conditions where all of mankind is united in worship of the only true God.

 
1 helpful answer

Put the politicians on the same retirement and health programs the rest of us are on- and stop using race questions on applications - once that happens will be a real start toward doing away with racial problems - if all are judged by what they can do and do  instead of how they look

 
3 helpful answers

I need no argument on this, I'm set in my position so if you have a problem with my opinion I really don't care. 

To right the United States of America we have a need to rescind everything that was brought about from the Great Society and limit all political terms to the intent of the Constitution of the United States of America.  The majority should rule; welfare is not a strategic career move; two years and you can beg.   America owes you nothing.  Earn it, don't steal it.  Believe in one God.  If you want in, assimilate or you will be executed.  The taxpayers of America own their money, not the politicians in Washington D.C.  The Death Penalty should be enforced (the evidence, the witnesses, the Judge and Jury have all said you're guilty.  At noon on the first of the month you're to be executed.  Your family gets the body.  No family, into the city landfill.)  There are nothing but Americans in the United States; we're a nation.  No law can be implemented without enforcement.  If the politicians cannot explain how to enforce it, then it's not a law.  We're not a nation of laws, we're a Christian nation and as such, there's the common sense rule.  If it looks wrong, it's probably wrong. (We don't need laws to tell us that we can't dump toxic waste in a river.  Today people think that if there's not a law against it, it's O.K. until we get a law.  All professions are important so if you're not producing something to sell, then don't ask for a lot of money.  College professor don't desert $150-200K salaries.  They're no more important than the refuse collector. Driving is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.  (Drivers training should be a nation program and the course should be about two months.  Speeding tickets should cost one week's salary and add an additional week for every subsequent ticket.  All vehicles should be road worthy-that means no broken windows, missing or inoperable required lighting, tires cannot be ran without adequate tread, texting and cell phone usage will get your license suspended for a week on each infraction.  You get cell phone back after that week, all traffic rules, signs, etc. will be obeyed, no Right-On-Red, no backing into a slanted slot (or the appearance thereof), and all vehicles in your yard must be registered and insured, all insurance is "No Fault" and there is no such thing as the "uninsured motorist" clause.  (if the other driver doesn't have insurance and he causes the wreck, let hope he's rich, my insurance is for me.  This is keeping it brief.)  Shopping carts cannot leave the building.  Police will be polite until provoked and then remember-you asked for it.  Rodney King asked for it.  There are no cameras in the court room. (Judge "The Joke" Tito ruined it for everyone.)  Technology is to take a break.  We have more stuff than we can play with now.  The expense is killing people.  As with all technology, the inventors are thinking of good and the users get the things into their hands and use them for bad, i.e. cell phones used to commit all sorts of drug trades, fights, prostitution, and to break up families and so on.  No business shall operate on Sunday.  Each town can operate one gas station for every 10,000 people, two drug stores, and hospital emergency rooms.  (Get to know your neighborhood.)  All people are the primary police, people are watching crimes and not reporting it, everyone pays when a crime is committed. As a wrap-up, we need a recall Amendment to the Constitution, if it's found that politicians who have sworn an oath to Protect and Defend the Constitution don't live up to that oath, we recall them and bar them from holding any office, i.e. Obama-the birth certificate is a requirement.  If, like Obama, they speak of a plan but don't follow it, and they're too arrogant to step down, we can recall them.  That's enough for now.  Hate me if you like.  Oh!  A marriage is a man and woman.  (the majority already agrees with that so keep Keith Olbermann away from me.

 
1 helpful answer

Well half of what you say makes sense  but the rest  - hope you find an island to live on  so yo can set yourself up as dictator. You were doing fine till got to the assimilate or execute- from there on you were on a rant and I do not care how you think any more then you do what sane people might  you first is fine and your last not far off but all in middle is horsehockey. It is not the expense  that is killing people financially it is their not having the sense not to by what do not need.

Your welfare idea and the ones about politicians  make sense but  agan you go off on rants about stuff that is not really important like the shopping carts.

 OK you do not care what folks say  but guess what  most do not care what you think either once stop making sense

 

Posted 2009-07-26T16:10:27Z
Helpful?(2)
Rated as Best Answer
 
3 helpful answers

Thanks, I'll try to say only pleasing things.  Oh, wait!  That's what the Liberals are doing.  They work on your emotions.  Maybe we need the illegal immigrants and like the Liberals/Progressive say, "We are all immigrants."  The shopping cart rant is a bonus, but I use it to show the lack of concern of other people's property that we've evolved into as a nation.  I probably didn't make myself clear on that.  The shopping carts are a courtesy and people abuse it something fierce.  I for one don't care to find someone else's shopping cart pushed against my vehicle.  I also don't approve of people walking by carts in the parking lot and picking one up on the inside instead just to leave it in the parking lot for the next guy.  And, if you have a license, I know that you've experienced seeing a parking space only to get there and see that you have to move the shopping carts out to use the space.  As a society, we need to police ourselves.   As Paul Harvey says, "We can't have self-government without self-discipline.  Sorry if I offended you.  I'll try not to rant.

 
1 helpful answer

"The haves pay for their privilege, the have-nots receive their fair share for not gaining a privilege.  Absolutely just, and society will benefit all round."

Sounds like another version of what Obama and company are trying to force through- Agree there needs to be away to help the "have nots" at least the LEGAL ones but should be in a way that lets them get up and have not to sustain them as have nots  for not doing anything to better selves. Help yes but not pay their way for life  that is just continuation of welfare as it has been before

Posted 2009-07-27T12:22:44Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #10 out of 28

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for HypnoFreak? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

ERGENT HELP FACEBOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ERGENT NEED HELP FACEBOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! does anyone know why my facebook account has been disabled i havent been doing ...
Submitted by kevin   7 months ago.
  • viewed 1684 times
Last answer posted 13 days ago by krhymes


Q:

The holy earthly genocide opus dei trinity of the ...

The holy earthly genocide opus dei trinity of the bloodthirsty orgies and the prostitution of the human rights to give birth to ...
Submitted by Vicariopusday   4 months ago.
  • viewed 847 times
Last answer posted 2 months ago by Alex Z.


Q:

Obama's Government Bribery Operation

Why is it that the President of the Senate can bribe a Senator to vote for the Health Care Bill and none of the them are jailed ...
Submitted by AShoofly   18 days ago.
  • viewed 449 times
Last answer posted 5 days ago by Nanadee



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Creating a (not) good society and a (not) bad society

Stable, prosperous society. But once the plot advances, and the perspective character looks closer out how to make one society initially seem good and the other bad, both socially and cosmetically Inspired by the Mistborn trilogy, I've started to jot down notes for a trilogy of my own that subverts or plays with well...

Edo village culture as the roots of 'Shoganai Society'?

Period villages functioned similarly to how modern Japanese society functions. This is mostly like a revolving door and this bores the people. They just wait for another kintaro ame to get for the apathy. Besides, with all the changes in government leadership in the post-war era, it's become

Quantity of society

Assuming that we do not change any of our current trends, what will society have become by 2060 are the product of the mentality of the government and the mentality of the people changes, in which case it will be as it is now only with more people. But that's obviously incorrect
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License