Do you think the KSM Trial should be held in NYC?

Here are some links to join in and have your say. You can also send a letter to president Obama.

 

Keep America Safe exists to provide information for concerned Americans about critical national security issues and encourage public dialogue.

Keep America Safe  

 




***CALL TO ACTION***  



 
November 21, 2009
 
Dear Supporter,
Last Wednesday, a group of 9/11 family members and New York first responders attended the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in which Attorney General Eric Holder testified about his decision to prosecute Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the 9/11 co-conspirators in a New York City federal court. Mr. Holder stumbled through several tough and pointed questions about the dangers of giving war criminals the same rights as American citizens and blurring the mission of our war fighters. He was visibly unnerved by the presence of the families and the first responders. We want to keep the pressure on him, as well as President Obama, who we were shocked to learn was AWOL on this reckless decision.
 
Nearly two weeks ago we sent a letter signed by 300 family members to President Obama, AG Holder and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. After Mr. Holder’s announcement last Friday, another 120,000 people (as of today) have signed the letter in support of our position. Many of these individuals are family members from all three attack sites, active & retired FDNY, PAPD & NYPD, first responders from throughout the country and active, reserve and retired members of the military.
Read all about it and sign the letter:
http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=1822


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

10 Posted Answers
Order by

 
25 helpful answers

A trial is an irresponsible act of the current administration.  It is politically motivated against Bush officials and helps al Qaeda and hostile nations by exposing American intelligence on KSM and American survellience techniques, etc.   The problem lies in the thought that we should give the same civil rights to terrorists/war criminals as we do law abiding US Citizens.   This is a national security threat and a threat to ordinary US Citizens.

Posted 2009-11-24T18:29:05Z
 
90 helpful answers

 Our Constitution is a document in which "We the People" tell the government what it is allowed to do.
Ronald Reagan in his farewell speech 1989 

I agree with Rattler with the addition that such an action changes the rules under which these cowards were caputured and therefore could remove much if not all of the evidence against them in court...We do not "Mirandize" people on the battle field and we do not require a court order for searches...These animals were apprehended under one set of rules and now they want to try them under another!

Posted 2009-11-24T18:50:20Z
 
279 helpful answers

Don't just rock the boat, turn it over, if you're not on it!

This is a threat to our National security. They're just trying to find our weakness. And, trying to bankrupt us with the cost of the trial. Obama, wants America weak so he can play his agenda out. At the same time tear down our justice system. This should be in Military Court not Civilian Court. The Miranda Warning is a issue. Islam would love to own America. Thanks for the invite DanG. 

Posted 2009-11-24T19:14:12Z
 
130 helpful answers

And He hath made my mouth like a sharp sword;  in the shadow of His hand hath He hid me,  and made me a polished shaft;  in  His  quiver  hath He hid me---Isaiah 49:2.

Well I will be a little more blunt and more to the point of name calling etc:&el." the only terriost that should be  going on trial in this coungtry is the "where is your birthcerticficate"-(_*_) the so called illegitimat president himself,WhAT SAY YE; YA! or NA!  And with the count of YA's and NA'S I make a motion to close this white house down! How say YE again YA! OR NA! ??

Posted 2009-11-24T19:38:13Z
 
90 helpful answers

"Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem.”

Philippians 4:13 "I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength."

Semper Fi

NO !!!!

Don't be surprised if some Liberal Lawyer gets these terrorists acquitted on some BS technicality.  And then the Obama Administration will Blame The Bush Policies for the acquittal.   This is part of their plan to help get Obama re-elected. 

They want to use this trail to show what The United States Military did to get information from terrorists.  This way they can escape accountability for photos and testimonies being released.

There can be no other explanation for having these trials here.

My stance is this ... I don't care what measures were taken to save American lives.  If we had to waterboard KSM to get his fat ass to talk, than so be it.  At least we didn't saw off his head like his people do.

These are terrorists ... They do not deserve the Geneva Convention.  They do not deserve to have rights under our Constitution.  They do not deserve to set foot in our Country or New York City for that matter. 

Obama is making our Country look weak and he's giving al-Qaeda exactly whay they want.

Posted 2009-11-24T22:43:01Z
 
Pam
18 helpful answers

Actually, yes, I think the trial should be held in New York.  No, I do not think the accused deserves the rights of a US citizen. 

Posted 2009-11-24T22:50:48Z
 
389 helpful answers

DanG

I signed the letter and sent it on. Thanks.

Posted 2009-11-25T02:21:10Z
 
2051 helpful answers

to words(FU*K NO)



NYC To Obama: No You Won't

 

The anointed one Obama and Attorney a*shole Holder have also grossly mistaken the ferocity with which this case will bubble up and that the inevitable media circus that will ensue will doom the welfare of America in multiple ways.
These trial proceedings will reopen the still mending emotional, psychological, and physical wounds of 9/11. In deciding with such reckless abandon to make a political pay-off to the far left, and the radical Islamic sympathizers they ignorantly embolden, The anointed one Obama is ripping the stitches out of the hearts of those that have wondered if closure will ever come. When the A*shole General promises court room cameras and complete transparency of the proceedings, he seems to ignore the possibility of radicals on camera shouting inaudible commands, jibes, and insults at those in the room as well as those sitting in caves across the globe.
The proceedings will create a bulls-eye again specifically on the most attractive target in America, and be used as an on-going tool of recruitment. Without question, terrorists may have been upset over the treatment of their colleagues at Gitmo, but striking back at the base was a logistical impossibility. Not so with a city of endless train and subway tubes, elevator shafts, a metro area with a nuclear reactor only miles away, and an island that could be isolated and brought to a halt given the right combination of carnage and chaos.
The proceedings are an unnecessary move on the part of the administration to try these particular four terrorists at all. They have all confessed, and even bragged, on the record, of their exploits and parts played in the single worst moment in America's history. With on-the-record confessions, the seeking of the death penalty was insured through military tribunal. What New Yorkers are now left with after the administration's move are mere words that Holder will "seek" the death penalty. And The anointed one Obama added his "assurance" that they would receive "the most exacting form of justice" possible. Yet if that was a foregone conclusion, why must he give assurances?
The proceedings are a not-so-veiled attempt to continue to throw negative attention on to the previous administration. In a move that gives birth to crass classlessness, the real endgame of this matter is to reveal military and intelligence secrets for the public and our enemies to judge for themselves as to their legitimate use. The goal of A*shole General Holder in essence becomes the beginning of the re-election campaign for The anointed one Obama, and to create a way for Persident George Bush to still be part of the discussion when the trial finally becomes a reality two to three years from now.
The proceedings are also a move that spends enormous amounts of money in an era where we have none extra to spend. The process for each of these four terrorists now begins all over again. Discovery, testimony, evidence that has all been worked and diligently put in place for dealing with enemy combatants taken in acts of war from the battlefield must now be sifted through a different standard. Depending on the political leanings of the judge assigned the case, it is even likely that many gaps will be left in the evidence path, and thus a jury will be instructed not to consider certain sections of otherwise admissible evidence.
I am hesitant to believe that even the The anointed one Obama administration with all of it's harshest left leanings would genuinely and truly want the mastermind and associates of 9/11 to ever walk free. But that possibility exists.
When O.J. Simpson was found innocent, they had his blood, mixed with Nicole Brown Simpson's on the scene, and in trails from one room to the next. And yet he walked. Should a similar outcome occur in this case, it would not shock me if we as tax-payers would be responsible for the cost of transporting them to their jihadist homelands where they go right back to work attempting to strike America again.
The average New Yorker understands all of this, as does easily the average American.
They also clearly see that The anointed one Obama and his minions like A*shole Holder are willing to play games with national security in order to make a pandering play to the minimalist base that still supports them strongly.
This travesty will not sit well in New York elections in 2010 and 2012 and unless The anointed one Obama decides to make a move that concedes these basic concerns as legitimate by those who lost the most in our nation's worst nightmare, he best consider the consequences.
New York City may be a town of liberals, but even we New Yorkers, in large numbers, on the issue of national security are willing to set aside many other concerns to insure the safety of our nation and our children. And along those lines Congressman Peter King pledges to fight with all his might for the next 45 days to overturn this amazing mistake by what can now easily be seen as the most arrogant administration ever.
One last parting note needs to be tucked in the back of the minds of  The anointed one Obama's administration, even if it doesn't give them much comfort.
I wonder what a Democratic Presidential Primary candidate in 2012 by the name of Hillary Clinton will have to say to her fellow New Yorkers about such a wrong-headed and utterly foolish gesture.
Stay the course Mr. President, and we might just get an answer to that question.
New Campaign Signs August 8, 2009 Posted by The Underground Conservative in 2010 Election, Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats, RINOs.
comments closed

Pilfered from The Green Room at HotAir:
090806-o-one-term3
As I’ve said before, after eight months of The Anointed One, I am nostalgic for days of Bill Clinton. Hell, I even miss Jimmy Carter.
Then there’s this one:
090806-o-oops3
Gee, ya think? That’s One Big Ass Mistake America!
Finally, this one: 
090806-o-2010-2s
That includes you RINOs as well. You sell out to go along in order to get along, you go. You can get along your sellout backside right out the door.
Who Do You Trust? August 8, 2009 Posted by The Underground Conservative in Barack Hussein Obama, Government-Run Health Care.
comments closed

When it comes to your health care, who do you trust? This guy?
Norman-RockwellDoctorDollPosterCard
Or this guy?
obama-healthcare1
Dear Leader Tells Us To Shut Up August 8, 2009

Posted 2009-11-25T09:25:19Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Dawg? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

9/11 trial in NY federal court

Do you agree with the Justice Department's decision (discussed recently by President Obama and Attorney General Holder) to try ...
Submitted by AOL News   3 months ago.
  • viewed 308 times
Last answer posted 2 months ago by Dawg


Q:

Do you think it is safe to take a flight in the US ...

Do you think it is safe to take a flight in the US on the 9/11 ?
Submitted by Osher   5 months ago.
  • viewed 307 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by osher2


Q:

What are the standard training procedures that 911 ...

What are the standard training procedures that 911 dipatchers must complete before they start their job?
Submitted by Kibbutz   2 years ago.
  • viewed 218 times
Last answer posted 2 years ago by goldengopher



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License