When are teenagers not teenagers anymore

How many parents are tired of being responsible for kids actions when they should know the difference between right and wrong by the age of 12. The teenager should be considered an adult by the age of 15. This would reduce much stress of the parent and give the teenager more responsibility for their actions besides now days the earthing teenagers are smarter than the parent and that is why there are so many conflicts in the parent teenager world. Send them to school of hard knox. that will quite their complaining. I don't like all that yelling anyway. The child must have respect for there parent?  Besides with all the sex out there come on parents we do not want 15 year old pregnancies on our hands because they are underage. Not to mention all those punks who don't mind. It is not the parents fault for jailhouse children. It is that teenagers fault they have a choice between what is right and wrong.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

3 Posted Answers
Order by

 
70 helpful answers
i love food... really any food

I agree that kids need to have more responsibility, the problem is that every teen matures at a different rate.  Girls, for example tend to get themselves into less trouble in their teens because they mature more quickly.  The teen doesn't need babying between the ages of 12-18, they need a parent to talk to that they can trust, they need role-models at home, they need disipline.  You need to have your child as close as he/she needs to be in order to make sure that things are OK. If your child isn't getting into trouble at all, the they can be give more space.  However, the more problematic the child is, the more you need to parent them until they day they turn 19.

 
2250 helpful answers

Turn off the television and teach your children how to think.

_______________________________________________

*I do not read or write anything in the "Comments" section.*

 

"Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old, he will not depart from it."

In most states, parents are responsible for their children until the child reaches the age of majority. In most cases, that is the age of 18.

You cannot wait until a child is a teen to begin disciplining him or her. Dropping the hammer on a child who has up until that moment been allowed to do whatever he or she wants does NOT teach a child anything except how to be devious.

Children must be taught self-discipline and manners from an early age. Restrictions must be made - and kept. Too often, consequences are announced but never carried out. No wonder teens don't listen, why should they? Nothing happens save for empty threats!

 
1 helpful answer

THank you

Posted 2009-05-08T06:16:48Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Eagle God? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Problem with banking procedures

Hi. I was a victim of credit card fraud, also bank card, and they got into my savings account. Tried using my name different ...
Submitted by babycakes   1 year ago.
  • viewed 204 times


Q:

Supervisory responsibilities

supervisory responsibilities
Submitted by samiera   10 months ago.
  • viewed 72 times


Q:

Which one is not tester responsibilities? 1 ...

Which one is not tester responsibilities? 1. Assure the process for contracting software is adequate 2. Review the adequacy ...
Submitted by srihari   1 year ago.
  • viewed 63 times



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AOL Autos Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners