What are these statements? Do they have any scientific value?

    You would eat all only if you could eat your self.
? You would move all only if you could move your self.
? You would create all only if you could create your self.
? You would measure all only if you could measure your self.
? You would force all only if you could force your self.
? You would analyze all only if you could analyze your self.
? You would distinguish all only if you could distinguish your self.
? You would imagine all only if you could imagine your self.
? You would represent all only if you could represent your self.
? You would teach all only if you could teach your self.
? You would learn all only if you could learn your self.
? You would study all only if you could study your self.
? You would use all only if you could use your self.
? You would change all only if you could change your self.

What are these statements? Do they have any scientific value?

[popularly known as the 'laws of sivahanmugam' in the students circle]


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
389 helpful answers

It's nonsense to me.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
2572 helpful answers

 

 Be honest and be true to yourself.

 I fully agree with Lido, it's a lot of crap to me.Frown

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Virgin Explorer? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Is there a need for mathematic in natural science ...

Is there a need for mathematic in natural science/scientific method. Why? If there is any, which steps of scientific method use ...
Submitted by jHNEA   1 year ago.
  • viewed 172 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by Dr. Bennett


Q:

Bad science.

I'm often arguing about myths of religion. Though I am an atheist I won't outright state there is no God as it is impossible to ...
Submitted by Dr.Evil   2 months ago.
  • viewed 287 times
Last answer posted 1 month ago by Physicalist


Q:

Why was livingstone signficance to science?

why was livingstone signficance to science?
Submitted by shirley   2 months ago.
  • viewed 103 times
Last answer posted 1 month ago by barbie



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

How important is it to understand the history of science in the...

One of the electives I took in college was a history of science course. It ended up being way to understand science. Yes, the reason being is to gain a better understanding of the methods

possibly the coolest science tattoo i have seen yet : science

Interested in seeing more of that subject matter, ifyouknowwhatimean. Is it Texan or Afghan science Interested in seeing more of that subject matter, ifyouknowwhatimean. Is it Texan or Afghan science? There's a difference...

Good music and fun science by They Might Be Giants, wish i had it like this...

That science and religion are wholly separate entities Upvote for schizophrenia. Songs so simple &feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhuMLpdnOjY Science isn't real; it's just a theory
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License