You would eat all only if you could eat your self.? You would move all only if you could move your self.? You would create all only if you could create your self.? You would measure all only if you could measure your self.? You would force all only if you could force your self.? You would analyze all only if you could analyze your self.? You would distinguish all only if you could distinguish your self.? You would imagine all only if you could imagine your self.? You would represent all only if you could represent your self.? You would teach all only if you could teach your self.? You would learn all only if you could learn your self.? You would study all only if you could study your self.? You would use all only if you could use your self.? You would change all only if you could change your self.
What are these statements? Do they have any scientific value?
[popularly known as the 'laws of sivahanmugam' in the students circle]
It's nonsense to me.
Be honest and be true to yourself.
I fully agree with Lido, it's a lot of crap to me.
Got an answer for Virgin Explorer? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them