"Most people see things as they are, and ask, 'why'? But I think of things that never were, and ask, 'why not'?" -- George Bernard Shaw.
I've read that salmon -- even canned salmn -- is very, very good for you. But salmon -- even canned salmon -- is also very, very expensive! Canned TUNA is much cheaper. What, (if anything), does canned salmon have -- nutritionally -- that canned tuna doesn't? And does it make any difference whether the tuna is albacore, (white), or light? Also -- are there any differences between pink salmon and red salmon, other than that pink salmon has less fat in it? (I like the taste of ALL canned salmon, and ALL canned tuna. But I'd like to get the most nutrition for the least cost!) Thanks!
Conservation: Paying more and getting less.
To me canned salmon stinks worse than tuna.
salmon cantains extremly high levels of Omegs-3 fatty acids. These acids reduce the risk of Coronary Heart disease with no Phaemaceuticals.
Got an answer for JustMe? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them
