Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

Those are my thoughts. I welcome yours.

 

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.

 

You HAVE to read this......


This is most definitely NOT a pro-Republican newspaper!!




  • |

Home > Voices > Editorials

BLANKLEY: Media covering for Obama Obama remains unknown Tony Blankley
Wednesday, September 24, 2008

OP-ED:

The mainstream media have gone over the line and are now straight out propagandists for the Obama campaign. While they have been liberal and blinkered in their worldview for decades, in 2007-08 for the first time, the major media are consciously covering for one candidate for president and consciously knifing the other. This is no longer journalism — it is simply propaganda. (The American left-wing version of the Volkischer Beobachter cannot be far behind.) And as a result, we are less than seven weeks away from possibly electing a president who has not been thoroughly and even half way honestly presented to the country by our watchdogs — the press.

The image of Barack Obama that the press has presented is not a fair approximation of the real man. They have consciously ignored whole years in his life, and showed a lack of curiosity about such gaps that bespeaks a lack of journalistic instinct. Thus, the public image of Mr. Obama is of a "Man who never was." I take that phrase from a 1956 movie about a real life WWII British intelligence operation to trick the Germans into thinking the Allies were going to invade Greece, rather than Italy, in 1943. Operation "Mincemeat" involved the acquisition of a human corpse dressed as a Maj. William Martin, R.M. and put into the sea near Spain. Attached to the corpse was a brief-case containing fake letters suggesting that the Allied attack would be against Sardinia and Greece.

To make the operation credible, British intelligence created a fictional life for the corpse — a letter from a lover, tickets to a London theater, all the details of a life — but not the actual life of the dead young man whose corpse was being used. So, too, the man the media has presented to the nation as Mr. Obama is not the real man.

The mainstream media ruthlessly and endlessly repeats any McCain gaffes, while ignoring Obama gaffes. You have to go to weird little Internet sites to see all the stammering and stuttering that Mr. Obama needs before getting out a sentence fragment or two. But all you see on the networks is an eventual one or two clear sentences from Mr. Obama. Nor do you see Mr. Obama's ludicrous gaffe that Iran is a tiny country and no threat to us. Nor his 57 American states gaffe. Nor his forgetting, if he ever knew, that Russia has a veto in the United Nations. Nor his whining and puerile "come on" when he is being challenged. This is the kind of editing one would expect from Goebbels' disciples, not Cronkite's.

More appalling, NBC's "Saturday Night Live" suggested that Gov. Sarah Palin's husband had sex with his own daughters. That scene was written with the assistance of Al Franken, Democratic Party candidate for Senate in Minnesota. Talk about incest.


Democratic presidential candidate Sen.Barack Obama, D-Ill., greets supporters before his speech in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina on September 21, 2008. (UPI Photo/Nell Redmond)

But worse than all the unfair and distorted reporting and image projecting, is the shocking gaps in Mr. Obama's life that are not reported at all. The major media simply has not reported on Mr. Obama's two years at Columbia University in New York, where, among other things, he lived a mere quarter mile from former terrorist Bill Ayers— after which they both ended up as neighbors and associates in Chicago. Mr. Obama denies more than a passing relationship with Mr. Ayers. Should the media be curious? In only two weeks the media has focused on all the colleges Mrs. Palin has attended, her husband's driving habits 20 years ago and the close criticism of Mrs. Palin's mayoral political opponents. But in two years they haven't bothered to see how close Mr. Obama was with the terrorist Ayers.

Nor have the media paid any serious attention to Mr. Obama's rise in Chicago politics — how did honest Obama rise in the famously sordid Chicago political machine with the full support of Boss Daley? Despite the great — and unflattering details on Mr. Obama's Chicago years presented in David Freddoso's new book, the mainstream media continues to ignore both the facts and the book. It took a British publication, the Economist, to give Mr. Freddoso's book a review with fair comment.

The public image of Mr. Obama as an idealistic, post-race, post-partisan, well-spoken and honest young man with the wisdom and courage befitting a great national leader is a confection spun by a willing conspiracy of Mr. Obama, his publicist David Axelrod and most of the senior editors, producers and reporters of the national media.

Perhaps that is why the National Journal's respected correspondent Stuart Taylor has written that "the media can no longer be trusted to provide accurate and fair campaign reporting and analysis." That conspiracy has not only photo-shopped out all of Mr. Obama's imperfections (and dirtied up his opponent Mr. McCain's image), but it has put most of his questionable history down the memory hole.

The public will be voting based on the idealized image of the man who never was. If he wins, however, we will be governed by the sunken, cynical man Mr. Obama really is. One can only hope that the senior journalists will be judged as harshly for their professional misconduct as Wall Street's leaders currently are for their failings.

Tony Blankley is a syndicated columnist.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

11 Posted Answers
Order by

 
lld
56 helpful answers

This article asks so many of the same questions that I and others have about Obama.  Frankly, I feel sick to my stomach observing all the media bias for him.  I am disappointed to see meanspirited ads mocking McCain's age, computer abilities etc.  I am also upset by the way the press has turned on Sarah Palin in just two weeks time!!

Posted 2008-09-26T07:36:04Z
Helpful?(2)
Rated #10 out of 11
 
2441 helpful answers

 

 

Lld,

   I'm with you on that.

Posted 2008-09-27T04:47:55Z
 
lld
56 helpful answers

Thank you DB Lady, I no longer watch MSNBC for that very reason stated above concerning bias in the press.  The parent company of  MSNBC also disgusts me knowing that they have done business with Iran.  My question would be how does someone voice their outrage against these deplorable business practices?  You know we are just one little voice in this world and it is so hard to get one's opinion out there.  What do we do?

Posted 2008-09-27T05:55:25Z
 
2441 helpful answers

 

 

Lld,

    I stopped watching other TV channels.  I just watch FOX NEWS.

Posted 2008-09-27T06:00:40Z
Helpful?(2)
Rated #11 out of 11
 
lld
56 helpful answers

I also regularly watch Fox news.  It's just nice to know there's one news group that doesn't hang on Obama's every word.

Posted 2008-09-27T06:52:28Z
 
2441 helpful answers

 

 

lld,

   I don't like watching CNN, they just adore Obama.  They must be getting a lot of money from him.

   Did you watch the  first presidential debate last night?  What do you think about our man?  I think he really did very well.Smile

Posted 2008-09-27T07:44:32Z
 
lld
56 helpful answers

Yes, I did watch the debate and I was proud that McCain took the offensive more often than not and pretty much kept Obama on the defense.  It's pretty easy to tell when Obama is flustered, that's when he starts stuttering a bit.  McCain had a good command of his facts and even though "some" in the news media said he wasn't "emotional" enough, I just plain like the guy, he leaves me with no doubt about National security issues.  Why in the world do they want him to be more emotional?  His calm and confident demeanor last night is what I think is required for good leadership ability. (though I do get a kick out of his beyond the microphones little flairs of temper now and then!)

Posted 2008-09-27T18:46:14Z
Helpful?(6)
Rated as Best Answer
 
132 helpful answers

Those are my thoughts. I welcome yours.

 

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.

 

Just to get more perspective you've got to watch more than just Fox.

I think Obama won the first 1/3...they split the middle 1/3...and McCain took the last 1/3.

Neither scored a knock out punch....and that bolsters Obama.

McCain is behind in the polls, he needs to win more points and more of the 'undecided'

Posted 2008-09-28T02:43:31Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for fredst? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Barack Obamas Vice president is Joe Biden ?

Barack Obamas Vice president is Joe Biden ? http://www.webcastr.com/videos/politics/hope-history-obama-biden-08.html
Submitted by BEN   1 year ago.
  • viewed 681 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by Bags


Q:

Obama President on Squidoo Tell us what you ...

Obama President on Squidoo Tell us what you think about the flamboyant Obama . Hillary should have withdrawn long ago. Who is ...
Submitted by Heinz Rainer   2 years ago.
  • viewed 642 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by A Brown
Asked about "Obama - president"


Q:

Were you aware of these tax differences between Obama & McCain?

Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election: CAPITAL GAINS TAX MCCAIN 0% on home sales up to $500,000 per ...
Submitted by fredst   1 year ago.
  • viewed 312 times
Last answer posted 6 months ago by fredst



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License