• Answers
  • Web
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:
Save
Cancel

Why don't the present day scientists & philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these?

Why don't the present day scientists & philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these?

Both science and philosophy offer no explanation on:
1. the origin and evoluton of divisibility,
2. the origin and evoluton of comparability,
3. the origin and evoluton of connectivity,
4. the origin and evoluton of disturbability,
5. the origin and evoluton of reorderability,
6. the origin and evoluton of substitutability and
7. the origin and evoluton of satisfiability.

Why don't the present day scientists and philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these properties? Why don't the research funding agencies for the promotion of science and philosophy promote research on these topics? Is such a research useless?


Answer this question
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

6 Posted Answers
Order by

 
113 answers
31 helpful answers

first you can eliminate origin from that factor imposible to find. second if there was an origin it would be the same as the origin of the mammal species. third and finally yes most of those 7 mental qualities are point less except for 3,4,5 those actully would be a very good thing to have research on due to evolution. which is an everyday thing that the univers evolves
Posted 2009-09-03T06:58:32Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #1 out of 6
 
1332 answers
283 helpful answers

I can't make sense out of your post.
Posted 2009-09-04T15:29:25Z
Lido was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #2 out of 6
 
18 answers
3 helpful answers

You are looking in the wrong discipline.  While some answers have been given in Philosophy, most have been answered in Theology.
Posted 2009-10-07T20:52:14Z
Turtleread was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #3 out of 6
 
182 answers
6 helpful answers

Word etiology seems to be what you have an interest in. Otherwise, you tell me how such research can be useful. I think your questions about evolution should pertain to biology, geology and cosmology etc. The word evolution is not used re: word etiology. Is it? 
Posted 2009-10-08T00:42:26Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #4 out of 6
 

For sure, you must designate the explanation
Posted 2009-10-20T09:36:17Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #5 out of 6
 

Philosophers simply offered an explanation - come on!
Posted 2009-11-08T12:00:04Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #6 out of 6

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for SoundaryaNayaki? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

The basic layout of science and philosophy

The following the basic layout of all science and philosopy. Do you disagree? Every science and philosophy is basically to ...
Submitted by SoundaryaNayaki   3 months ago.
  • 11 answers
  • viewed 290 times
Last answer posted 1 day ago by frevelm


Q:

What is the difference between philosophy and ...

What is the difference between philosophy and science and between philosophic and scientific explanations? Is "philosophy of ...
Submitted by drabsv   2 years ago.
  • 8 answers
  • viewed 2606 times
Last answer posted 3 months ago by SoundaryaNayaki


Q:

What is the contribution made by universities in the development of philsophy/computer operating sytems?

What is the contribution made by universities in the development of philsophy/computer operating sytems? Philosophy is taught in ...
Submitted by SoundaryaNayaki   2 months ago.
  • 6 answers
  • viewed 114 times
Last answer posted 8 days ago by Alessandro Colombo



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

If science part of philosophy? What makes science unique? Is science a...

Philosophy has been tied into science for quite some time, I want to say always but I don't know philosophy or the history between the sciences and philosophy. I confess, I'm misunderstanding you Armchair philosophers unite. Navel-gazing at its finest.

philosophy is a science right?

Im taking philosophy 105, im just not good with sciences and math and numbers, so im taking philosophy 105 to skip my math classes. my dad is lawyer so i have big pressure on doing good in school question...I would have use to say no that philosophy is not a science but recently I have realized

Philosophy vs. Science

Though I am quite well aware that the methodology of both sides, Science and Philosophy of the matter. Is there an inherent difference between Science and Philosophy? In a sense, are there certain... If I had to choose one of them to keep around, as they are now, I'd take science. Philosophy is nifty
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License