Why don't the present day scientists & philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these?

Why don't the present day scientists & philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these?

Both science and philosophy offer no explanation on:
1. the origin and evoluton of divisibility,
2. the origin and evoluton of comparability,
3. the origin and evoluton of connectivity,
4. the origin and evoluton of disturbability,
5. the origin and evoluton of reorderability,
6. the origin and evoluton of substitutability and
7. the origin and evoluton of satisfiability.

Why don't the present day scientists and philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these properties? Why don't the research funding agencies for the promotion of science and philosophy promote research on these topics? Is such a research useless?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

6 Posted Answers
Order by

 
31 helpful answers

first you can eliminate origin from that factor imposible to find. second if there was an origin it would be the same as the origin of the mammal species. third and finally yes most of those 7 mental qualities are point less except for 3,4,5 those actully would be a very good thing to have research on due to evolution. which is an everyday thing that the univers evolves

 
337 helpful answers

I can't make sense out of your post.

Posted 2009-09-04T15:29:25Z
Lido was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

 
10 helpful answers

You are looking in the wrong discipline.  While some answers have been given in Philosophy, most have been answered in Theology.

Posted 2009-10-07T20:52:14Z
Turtleread was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

 
12 helpful answers

Word etiology seems to be what you have an interest in. Otherwise, you tell me how such research can be useful. I think your questions about evolution should pertain to biology, geology and cosmology etc. The word evolution is not used re: word etiology. Is it? 

 

For sure, you must designate the explanation

 

Philosophers simply offered an explanation - come on!

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for SoundaryaNayaki? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

The basic layout of science and philosophy

The following the basic layout of all science and philosopy. Do you disagree? Every science and philosophy is basically to ...
Submitted by SoundaryaNayaki   4 months ago.
  • viewed 373 times
Last answer posted 29 days ago by Sweet Marie


Q:

What is the difference between philosophy and ...

What is the difference between philosophy and science and between philosophic and scientific explanations? Is "philosophy of ...
Submitted by drabsv   2 years ago.
  • viewed 2860 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by SoundaryaNayaki


Q:

Could you answer any one of the following questions?

What properties of science could be known through you? What properties of philosophy could be known through you? What properties ...
Submitted by SoundaryaNayaki   17 days ago.
  • viewed 40 times
Last answer posted 14 days ago by annette



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

What thou thinkest, the relationship between philosophy and science

They fit together. I feel that science is given presedence over everything, which is a clear cultural analyzing or understanding the implications.) Should science be the template from which to form our Science has it's limitations which are highlighted by philosophy, but many philosophers use science

Science & Philosophy, Where to Draw the Line...

But science has the philosophy that you must always stick with a strict method in order to keep method, but science holds the philosophy of pureness in objectivity, which is why it is so good attributes. If investigated correctly, philosophy is as accurate as any other science. For example

philosophy is a science right?

Im taking philosophy 105, im just not good with sciences and math and numbers, so im taking philosophy 105 to skip my math classes. my dad is lawyer so i have big pressure on doing good in school question...I would have use to say no that philosophy is not a science but recently I have realized
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AOL Autos Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners