Why don't the present day scientists & philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these?
Both science and philosophy offer no explanation on: 1. the origin and evoluton of divisibility, 2. the origin and evoluton of comparability, 3. the origin and evoluton of connectivity, 4. the origin and evoluton of disturbability, 5. the origin and evoluton of reorderability,6. the origin and evoluton of substitutability and 7. the origin and evoluton of satisfiability. Why don't the present day scientists and philosophers come farward to offer an explanation on these properties? Why don't the research funding agencies for the promotion of science and philosophy promote research on these topics? Is such a research useless?
first you can eliminate origin from that factor imposible to find. second if there was an origin it would be the same as the origin of the mammal species. third and finally yes most of those 7 mental qualities are point less except for 3,4,5 those actully would be a very good thing to have research on due to evolution. which is an everyday thing that the univers evolves
I can't make sense out of your post.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings › My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
You are looking in the wrong discipline. While some answers have been given in Philosophy, most have been answered in Theology.
Word etiology seems to be what you have an interest in. Otherwise, you tell me how such research can be useful. I think your questions about evolution should pertain to biology, geology and cosmology etc. The word evolution is not used re: word etiology. Is it?
For sure, you must designate the explanation
Philosophers simply offered an explanation - come on!
Got an answer for SoundaryaNayaki? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them
