A penny saved  is a penny earned

Did you see this

now i have heard it all

OSLO -President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday in a stunning decision designed to encourage his initiatives to reduce nuclear arms, ease tensions with the Muslim world and stress diplomacy and cooperation rather than unilateralism.

Nobel observers were shocked by the unexpected choice so early in the Obama presidency, which began less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama woke up to the news a little before 6 a.m. EDT. The White House had no immediate comment on the announcement, which took the administration by surprise.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee decided not to inform Obama before the announcement because it didn't want to wake him up, committee chairman Thorbjoern Jagland said.

"Waking up a president in the middle of the night, this isn't really something you do," Jagland said.

The Nobel Committee lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama's calls for peace and cooperation but recognized initiatives that have yet to bear fruit: reducing the world stock of nuclear arms, easing American conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthening the U.S. role in combating climate change.

"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," Jagland said.

Obama's election and foreign policy moves caused a dramatic improvement in the image of the U.S. around the world. A 25-nation poll of 27,000 people released in July by the Pew Global Attitudes Project found double-digit boosts to the percentage of people viewing the U.S. favorably in countries around the world. That indicator had plunged across the world under President George W. Bush.

Still, the U.S. remains at war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Congress has yet to pass a law reducing carbon emissions and there has been little significant reduction in global nuclear stockpiles since Obama took office.

"So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far. He is still at an early stage. He is only beginning to act," said former Polish President Lech Walesa, a 1983 Nobel Peace laureate.

"This is probably an encouragement for him to act. Let's see if he perseveres. Let's give him time to act," Walesa said.

The award appeared to be a slap at Bush from a committee that harshly criticized Obama's predecessor for his largely unilateral military action in the wake of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. The Nobel committee praised Obama's creation of "a new climate in international politics" and said he had returned multilateral diplomacy and institutions like the U.N. to the center of the world stage.

"You have to remember that the world has been in a pretty dangerous phase," Jagland said. "And anybody who can contribute to getting the world out of this situation deserves a Nobel Peace Prize."

Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which are awarded by Swedish institutions, the peace prize is given out by a five-member committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament. Like the Parliament, the committee has a leftist slant, with three members elected by left-of-center parties. Jagland said the decision to honor Obama was unanimous.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who won the prize in 1984, said Obama's award shows great things are expected from him in coming years.

"It's an award coming near the beginning of the first term of office of a relatively young president that anticipates an even greater contribution towards making our world a safer place for all," Tutu said. "It is an award that speaks to the promise of President Obama's message of hope."

Until seconds before the award, speculation had focused on a wide variety of candidates besides Obama: Zimbabwe's Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, a Colombian senator, a Chinese dissident and an Afghan woman's rights activist, among others. The Nobel committee received a record 205 nominations for this year's prize, though it was not immediately apparent who nominated Obama.

"The exciting and important thing about this prize is that it's given to someone ... who has the power to contribute to peace," Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said.

Obama is the third sitting U.S. president to win the award: President Theodore Roosevelt won in 1906 and President Woodrow Wilson was awarded the prize in 1919.

Wilson received the prize for his role in founding the League of Nations, the hopeful but ultimately failed precursor to the contemporary United Nations.

The Nobel committee chairman said after awarding the 2002 prize to former Democratic President Jimmy Carter, for his mediation in international conflicts, that it should be seen as a "kick in the leg" to the Bush administration's hard line in the buildup to the Iraq war.

Five years later, the committee honored Bush's adversary in the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore, for his campaign to raise awareness about global warming.

Obama was to meet with his top advisers on the Afghan war on Friday to consider a request by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, to send as many as 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan as the U.S war there enters its ninth year.

Obama ordered 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan earlier this year and has continued the use of unmanned drones for attacks on militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a strategy devised by the Bush administration. The attacks often kill or injure civilians living in the area.

In July talks in Moscow, Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev agreed that their negotiators would work out a new limit on delivery vehicles for nuclear warheads of between 500 and 1,100. They also agreed that warhead limits would be reduced from the current range of 1,700-2,200 to as low as 1,500. The United States now as about 2,200 such warheads, compared to about 2,800 for the Russians.

But there has been no word on whether either side has started to act on the reductions.

Former Peace Prize winner Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, said Obama has already provided outstanding leadership in the effort to prevent nuclear proliferation.

"In less than a year in office, he has transformed the way we look at ourselves and the world we live in and rekindled hope for a world at peace with itself," ElBaradei said. "He has shown an unshakeable commitment to diplomacy, mutual respect and dialogue as the best means of resolving conflicts."

Obama also has attempted to restart stalled talks between the Israelis and Palestinians, but just a day after Obama hosted the Israeli and Palestinian leaders in New York, Israeli officials boasted that they had fended off U.S. pressure to halt settlement construction. Moderate Palestinians said they felt undermined by Obama's failure to back up his demand for a freeze.

Nominators for the prize include former laureates; current and former members of the committee and their staff; members of national governments and legislatures; university professors of law, theology, social sciences, history and philosophy; leaders of peace research and foreign affairs institutes; and members of international courts of law.

The Nelson Mandela Foundation welcomed the award on behalf of its founder Nelson Mandela, who shared the 1993 Peace Prize with then-South African President F.W. DeKlerk for their efforts at ending years of apartheid and laying the groundwork for a democratic country.

"We trust that this award will strengthen his commitment, as the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, to continue promoting peace and the eradication of poverty," the foundation said.

In his 1895 will, Alfred Nobel stipulated that the peace prize should go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses."

The committee has taken a wide interpretation of Nobel's guidelines, expanding the prize beyond peace mediation to include efforts to combat poverty, disease and climate change.

God bless and be with us all  AT THIS TIME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE MEN AND WOMAN  THAT IS KEEPING OUR FREEDOM

NANADEE   Cool


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

5 Posted Answers
Order by

 
177 helpful answers

A penny saved  is a penny earned

Hi everybody out there. Hate to tell you the sad news.Frown

Now the proof is in the pudding.  Who could honestly say now

" NO ONE HAS BEEN IN THE COOKIE JAR.  This proves how crooked they are in our white house.  Shame  shame.  What a disgrace to our country and to others that deserve that besides him.

This still does not change my mind about him.  Devil in disquize.  What's next.  A man having a baby ?  Or three babies.

God bless

Nanadee  Cool

Posted 2009-10-09T14:16:32Z
 
3 helpful answers

There were no tensions with the  Muslem world before Islamic Terrorists attacked us on 9/11, murdering near 3000 people in one morning...They started this war; and I haven't heard any regrets or apologies from that, so called, Muslem, world. Not responding, in kind, to such a terrible attack on our country only shows, to people of that world, like Bin Laden etc., cowardice. It only encourages them to persist in their efforts to overpower & control our free & democratic nation. Our past president did not start this war. He responded the way I would expect our commander in chief to respond to an attack on our country. Our present president seems to be worried about what the world, at large, thinks of the USA, and about his own, personal, image in that world...be concerned!!!

Posted 2009-10-10T05:00:03Z
JJ Connolly was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
3 helpful answers

Don't worry, be Happy!

I must say I was completely taken aback when I saw in the news that Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.  I don't see that he has done anything Prize worthy.  OK, he tried to restart talks between Isreal and Palestine, but accomplished nothing, and dropped the ball when he couldn't have things his way.  His talks with Russia to limit nuclear warheads has shown no progress.  He ordered 21,000 troops to Afghanistan earlier this year,  which certainly doesn't make sense given his views on negotiating peace.

I could go on and on, but you already know all this.  I personally believe he is a closet Muslim. I don't trust him any further than I could throw him.  I think the Nobel Peace Prize Commitee is biased, and it's way to early for them to be making this decision.

Posted 2009-10-11T12:44:48Z
Hello Kiddo was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
39 helpful answers

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, Establish Justice,; insure domestic Tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general Welare, and to Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and to our Posterity, do ordain and establish the Constitution of the United States of America.

"The Nobel Committee lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama's calls for peace and cooperation but recognized initiatives that have yet to bear fruit: reducing the world stock of nuclear arms, easing American conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthening the U.S. role in combating climate change." That is why Obama was chosen. If nothing more he is changing the "Shoot from the hip" President that we had the last eight years. Michael Joel Held

Posted 2009-10-11T23:23:51Z
Michael Joel Held was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

 
DYK
6 helpful answers

DidYouKnow writes:  I get it.  And Michael's correct.  It's a hedge bet on the future in that the charisma and capital Obama seems to possess will be used in a most positive manner, and the world will be better off for the effort.  Not so much a gamble by them, but a calculated risk.  The world, now, is the jury; the intervening time slot of Obama's presidency will be the time for the offerings of proofs, pro and con; what happens, happens, the final results being weighed, and a verdict rendered.

In the meantime, there should be pride that the president of the United States received this prestigious honor, and let's hope he can live up to its expectations.

Posted 2009-10-12T00:10:56Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Nanadee? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Do you think it is wise to trust the government to ...

Do you think it is wise to trust the government to run GM, banks, health care, etc.... when they can't efficiently run anything ...
Submitted by Lisa   6 months ago.
  • viewed 3771 times
Last answer posted 10 days ago by max


Q:

Strategic political capital

What is exactly "strategic political capital"? Is there a text book answer or is this just another politician expresion?
Submitted by Charles P. T. Miller   2 months ago.
  • viewed 284 times
Last answer posted 1 day ago by Michael Johnson


Q:

Political Polls

These polls done daily - I have never been called in my life. I polled 50 other people verbally wiithin my age group, and they ...
Submitted by Mtngirl   7 months ago.
  • viewed 375 times
Last answer posted 17 days ago by Rocket112
Asked about "Obama AP Poll"



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics...

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Advise me please. Re: Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Entirely depends really... not that you should choose a course or uni based on purely that.Re: Is politics on its own

Hey Politics, I'm brand new to politics in general and want to learn. Where...

I have never wanted to get into politics before because I always felt that my say wouldn't count . Therefore, I want a good unbiased overview of whats happening. I know the basics of government and politics -made.Yeah, even as someone who didn't get into politics that much I could see that all the time

If one chooses to engage in politics, and I am as fascinated by it as anyone...

Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths. Makes sense. I'm a sociopath, now? Cool.What part of gummint do you work for?The voting constituency!Cheers. That leaves me out.
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License