What chance does Ron Paul have in the election of ...

40%....My dog told me so.

Zero, in my opinion.

Hilary has already 'won'. Don't you get it: 'Elected by ballot, but selected by blood'. It's already there before your eyes you sheeple: Bush, Clinton, Bush,.....dah-dah Clinton. Oh it's Democracy they say! :-P

Ron Paul is the best suited - he's against the Fed, war and fat cats. He's pro-life (he's a doctor after all!), pro-human right and privacy. He's got better scholarly mind on foreign affairs, national security and economy than Clinton, Reagan and both Bushes for sure.

Then again only Senators get elected - it's the old Roman fetish of the Governors and Senators getting to have the rule control and power. Remember Julius Caesar dictated his own way, he governed over his masses. 

Very small. He has told the truth to often. This is a sure way not to get votes.

I think the last Senator to be elected was Kennedy. Most of the recently elected presidents have been govenors.

However I do agree he is best suited. To bad he tells the truth.

I'm not voting for anyone who wishes to take away my rights as a female.I don't think I could ever make the choice to abort,but having the option is vital.Abortions will be performed whether they are legal or not.Instead of women dying in makeshift basement clinics they should be able to make the most difficult decision of their life and live to tell the tale.I believe Ron Paul has lost many female votes.