Can there be one quality for every dimension in our universe?

Is it possible that every dimension in our known universe involveson equality, which in turn is controlled and (even more) controlling movements in that dimension?

There may, possibly, be a way to establish that each space-like dimension (ncluding our well-know material three) is basedon choice, and every timelike is based on intuition.

That would in a sense mean that there is a capacity in the dimensional system to stay away from telling us why we are inadequate for a way to know. In other words, there would be no way of knowing what to say there isn't tokens for.

More adequatefor saying, there wouldbea universe we know. The eleven dimensions may be:

1: Choice in the most general way.

2: Choice with possible prejudice.

3: Connecivity added to prejudice, meaning there may be alliances!

This connectivity may appear by means of priorities among prejudices.

4: Intuition about why not to beprejudice.

5: Choice based upon intuition about why not to be prejudice.

6: Intuition about how to get away with prejudices.

7: Choice basedon choices based  on why notto be prejudice.

8: Intuition about making prejudices into just personality traits.

9: Intuition about making connectivity into what you want connectivity to be.

10: Intuition about how to beprejudice about knowing something about why not to be prejudice ... adds up to capacity to think.

11: Choice based on intuiton about how to get away with prejudice.

Probably, every choice-complex of more than two choices, involves a choice where preference is the important part. Three choices involves creting a chance for priority! The difference in number of choices made can in that context be important , because it creates an opportunity for a priority of a more complex thought!


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

4 Posted Answers
Order by

 
389 helpful answers

I have no idea what you're saying.   Undecided

Posted 2009-11-22T02:48:25Z
 
1653 helpful answers

Happy Valentine's. Play us a rose, you're organic, man.

Victims of circumstance owe it to fate. Victims of choice owe it to themselves.

I never got past the Fifth Dimension.

Jay

Posted 2009-11-22T06:29:37Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
14 helpful answers

There is no better guide through darkness then your own balance

frevelm Hi, ...it creates an opportunity for a priority of a more complex thought!...

Please not more complex!
Geometry:
The quality of the 1. dimension is length
The quality of the 1. + 2. dimension is area
The quality of the 1. + 2. + 3. dimension is space
Time you could call a restriction of consciousness, without time consciousness is infinitive (You are omni-present).
The question is not, how many dimension we have,
the question is, why we have only 3 (and the limitation of time).
Physics need 11 to explain the world, but this will change, when theories change. More interesting is to work with the 4. spatial dimension in geometry or to calculate x-dimensional space.
Our world is build up by:
1/2 spin energy-space-geometries, called fermions
1 spin energy-space-geometries, called electro-magnetic forces
2 spin energy-space-geometries, called gravity.
That is all about our world, and has all a geometric quality called spin.
Of course it has consciousness, intuition, but this quality covers a lot.

Posted 2009-11-25T15:59:15Z
gunter was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
14 helpful answers

There is no better guide through darkness then your own balance

Message
Hi frevelm, you speak about hyper symmetry of all kinds of energy forms as bosons, fermions etc. The energy of anti matter  doesn't mean anti energy. The relation of energy to spatial 3D's is defined by h (Planck'sche effect). Therefore 3D's of space can be used for hyper symmetry too. No need to invent new dimension but it is always a question of definition.
In 1D you need 1 value  + time to define the place.
In 2D you need 2 values + time to define the place.

In 3D you need 3 values + time to define the place.
You don't need 1D-time, 2D-time etc. But some of the physicists tend to use 22 dimensions to explain the world, some of them 11 dimension and some only 6 dimension. But for our own cognition we should not speculate with dimension, we should always try to reduce them to the minimum.
One thing is certain , since Einsteins theory of relativity and the effect of space warping, we urgently need a 4. spatial dimension. If we go into the symmetry of the 4. dimension, we would find a different shape of Black Holes as Stephan Hawking it depictures, a different shape of the Big Bang and hence a different form of our universe.

Posted 2009-12-02T08:59:09Z
gunter was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for frevelm? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Quantum theroy Vs. Physics?

I've seen a couple of movies read a couple of articles about it but I was intersted in knowing if the "quantum theory " is ...
Submitted by Deni   3 years ago.
  • viewed 1738 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by CogitoErgoCogitoSum


Q:

Physics and video games

How do computer game designers (or game console makers) use knowledge of physics to improve game play?
Submitted by triciamcdent   3 years ago.
  • viewed 781 times
Last answer posted 7 months ago by C4RM1N3



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

move from core science to physics

Move from core science to physics Hey I'm currently in year 11 and do core science but i realy double science/physics gcse. Now i'm about half way through year 11 now that its new years Re: move from core science to physics Why are you only doing Core Science in Year 11? Re: move

What book(s) would you recommend as a good overview of the current model ...

The goal of /r/Physics is to produce a subreddit frequented both by physicists and scientists in related fields, and by those interested in physics. Papers from physics journals are especially is no more complicated than in any other branch of physics. For instance, I think modern mathematicians

Advanced Higher Physics (or for that matter, any Science) Investigations

Advanced Higher Physics (or for that matter, any Science) Investigations So, as you've guessed , I'm doing Advanced Higher Physics (leave the why on earth's for later). My investigation is entitled Physics (or for that matter, any Science) Investigations My chemistry investigation is turning out
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License