Did you know there is a "movement" to form a global economy and global government?

The global economy exists now.  It is easy to convert any currency into any other.  We get peaches in the Spring, from Chile, and orange juice all year around from California, Florida, or Brazil.  

If it took weeks for any physical object to get from Kansas City to Paris or Peking, and if information could only travel as fast as the physical object (a piece of paper) that held it, the Global Economy would not exist.  And when that was true, it didn't.

Does somebody control the Global Economy?  Not really, or what is happening now wouldn't be happening.  Does somebody (anybody) understand the Global Economy?  Again, not really, although many people understand enough to make money from things international.  Are there people who influence the Global Economy?  Of course; any business or political leader has some influence (how could he not).

Do we want to keep the Global Economy from crashing, as it now threatens to do? I think yes.  Do we think this can be achieved without some sort of coordination?  (Some economic theories think it can, but they presuppose a free, unrigged market and the rule of law; try achieving the rule of law without generally-agreed-on laws, law enforcers, and judges; try achieving that without coordination.)

Do we want this sort of coordination to be done by whoever runs the Global Economy, in secret, or more in public by (ugh) political leaders and bureaucrats as well as businessmen and tycoons?

The global economy is a fact, and has been a fact for over a century.  The first attempts toward global government (so much weaker and more spastic than our original Articles of Confederation) are just the attempts of the human race to make the planet more habitable, get some control over the conditions of our existence, or at least avoid making it uninhabitable and thereby causing our own extinction -- a real possibility because of the same power that has created the global economy.

Not liking what some people think about this is natural.  Wanting them and everyone else not to think about this is just nuts.  We have to do this, so let's figure out how to do it right (whatever we decide that is). 

Look at my Bilderburger posts on YEDDA.Yes, there is, and has been, a conspiracy, now driven by George Soros.

MRD

All this stuff is pretty new for me. I will look into the sites you have posted. Much thanks. I have read through some other sites and just can't get past the bullshit and have a hard time trying to figure out what has some truth to it. Even though some are rather convincing, I sure would like other opinions on some of these topics of conspiracy. 

Good research on what you have listed in your question.

Another big part of the conspiracy is that of the central banks, which includes the Federal Reserve, with their main purpose to get every country into an unpayable debt situation.  All of the same names in the banking cartels show up in the CFR &  Bilderbergs such as the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc.   What I found a few days ago is very disturbing.   The creation of a new bank, called the World Conservation Bank, which would give a country who's debt is in default the money needed to pay it's central bank in exchange for that country's wilderness areas.   Handing over vast amounts of land as collateral.   The country most talked about that I've seen is Brazil, in danger of losing the Amazon River Basin and all of its natural resources.   This fits into their model of environmental conservation, but its a big step toward control of hugh tracts of land potentially worldwide.

The UN is very close with these groups too, and they have almost every country's ratification of The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) which would give majority control of the oceans over to the UN.   The US is the only country that has not signed, but as of March 2009, the Senate was preparing to.  My guess is that Obama will hold a gun to their heads if he has to.

And, from the G20 meeting in London we had big steps taken to develop a global currency.

Yep, we're getting close...

A global economy, or something approximating it, is (per severed) at least in process.  It need not be a big problem; this admin. has shot down any possibility of common currency or anything more involved that we have now.

The real source of concern is a campaign for political globalism.  We have already lost over 4,000 lives, and our integrity, over this quest.  The idea (per Cheney) was that 20 uninterrupted GOP years would allow completion of the campaign.  We are safe for right now, but the quest is not dead, and eventually the GOP will return to the White House. 

we're closr than any of us think, I believe.  The following was taken from a post by another member a few weeks ago after the G20 meeting.

On April 2, 2009, the work of July 4, 1776 was nullified at the meeting of the G-20 in London.  The joint communiqué essentially announces a global economic union with uniform regulations and bylaws for all nations, including the United States.  Henceforth, our SEC, Commodities Trading Commission, Federal Reserve Board and other regulators will have to march to the beat of drums pounded by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), a body of central bankers from each of the G-20 states and the European Union.
The mandate conferred on the FSB is remarkable for its scope and open-endedness.  It is to set a "framework of internationally agreed high standards that a global financial system requires."  These standards are to include the extension of "regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments, and markets...[including] systemically important hedge funds."
Note the key word: "all ."  If the FSB, in its international wisdom, considers an institution or company "systemically important", it may regulate and over see it.  This provision extends and internationalizes the proposals of the Obama Administration to regulate all firms, in whatever sector of the economy that it deems to be "too big to fail."
The FSB is also charged with "implementing...tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms."
That means that the FSB will regulate how much executives are to be paid and will enforce its idea of corporate social responsibility at "all firms."
The head of the Financial Stability Forum, the precursor to the new FSB, is Mario Draghi, Italy's central bank president.  In a speech on February 21, 2009, he gave us clues to his thinking.  He noted that "the progress we have made in revising the global regulatory framework...would have been unthinkable just months ago."
He said that "every financial institution capable of creating systemic risk will be subject to supervision." He adds that "it is envisaged that, at international level, the governance of financial institutions, executive compensation, and the special duties of intermediaries to protect retail investors will be subject to explicit supervision."
In remarks right before the London conference, Draghi said that while "I don't see the FSF [now the FSB] as a global regulator at the present time...it should be a standard setter that coordinates national agencies."
This "coordination of national agencies" and the "setting" of "standards" is an explicit statement of the mandate the FSB will have over our national regulatory agencies.
Obama, perhaps feeling guilty for the US role in triggering the international crisis, has, indeed, given away the store!  Now we may no longer look to presidential appointees, confirmed by the Senate, to make policy for our economy.  These decisions will be made internationally.
And Europe will dominate them.   The FSF and, presumably, the FSB, is now composed of the central bankers of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States plus representatives of the World Bank, the European Union, the IMF, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
 Europe, in other words, has six of the twelve national members.  The G-20 will enlarge the FSB to include all its member nations, but the pro-European bias will be clear.  The United States, with a GDP three times that of the next largest G-20 member (Japan), will have one vote.  So will Italy.

This administration hasn't stopped anything.  They're controlled by the same people that run the GOP.  Obama, Geithner, the Bush boys, Cheney, Clinton, Gore, they're all elitist puppets.  Our government has been hijacked out from underneath us.  Go after the CFR and Bilderbergs to find out where our trouble comes from.

It appears that to a large extent, these so-called secret new world orders are red herrings.  The real threat is The Project for the New American Century, whose membership includes Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc.  They are not secret; they apparently are comfortable that we will spend our time hounding after false conspiracy theories while they complete their agenda. 

Information on the news in the past two days confirms, though, that our invasion of Iraq without cause was one of the open goals of the group--which devised a plan to use the American military to seize countries in the middle of foreign regions and go forth from them to conquer the region.

Look it up.  It's no secret.