Do you think Michael Moore is a reliable fact presenter?
Accidentally caught Bowling for Columbine yesterday, and came up with this question today. Anyway, I consider Michael Moore to be very reliable. It's a hunch, though, can't really explain why.
No. Did you ever see farenhype 911. It's a whole movie dedicated to exposing the way that michael moore minipulated the facts and the people in the movie to make it reflect his message.
Got an answer for zuzak? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
... I have just recently started reading Michael Moore's book Stupid White Men. I have also seen Farenheit 9/11 and Bowling for Columbine, both films by Michael Moore. I am British, but I have a big - more...
... businessmen.... where oh where are you Michael? And if they had funded the Bush library...would he Michael Moore Maureen Dowd The Guardian Quote: Originally posted by erowan: ... - more...
... , unobjective, unfair, only shows one side of the story, etc. So my question to the Moore critics: who said , or more factually accurate than Moore? - more...
Powered by: