27 thumbs up

Do man really prefer blonds ?

Do man really prefer blonds ?

Is there an actual research that proves this ? If so why is it , I mean is  it in men's nature or is it a "blame society"  thing ?


  • 1124 views
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 

Best Answer

 
65 thumbs up

'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes' is the title of an extremely amusing novel written by Anita Loos in the early part of the last century (subsequently made into a movie starring Marilyn Monroe).  The title references the simultaneously naive and world-wise pronouncements of the novel's heroine, Lorelei, and has made its way into popular culture, but is not a presumption based on any kind of anthropological, biological or sociological fact.

 In fact, just as many men prefer brunettes, redheads or any other hair color/type as they do blondes.

 I happen to be a blonde who did not start out as one, but who decided to give nature a hand in my late thirties (or, as I like to put it, I finally decided to stop dyeing my hair dark brown and go back to being a natural blonde....)  As far I'm  concerned it was a great move, simply because my hair color is now more flattering to my features than the color I was born with.  However, I received just as much male attention when I was a brunette as I have done since becoming a blonde - so my personal experience also bears this out!

 


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
In reply to shine's question
cindygallop was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Rated as
Best Answer
0
2

Helpful?

line
line
line


 

All Answers

Order by
 
BmB
11 thumbs up

My girl is blond and I can't get my eyes of her.

I found something interesting.


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
In reply to shine's question
Rated as
#3 out of 3
2
1

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
27 thumbs up

10X bmb


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
#2 out of 3
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



Sign in to participate

Got an answer for shine? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Describe someone who is your opposite number

Try to describe someone that's the opposite to you, in every detail. Then ask to yourself: may he/she be your friend?
Submitted by qzmaster591 3 months ago
  • viewed 149 times

Last answer posted 3 months ago by taligat


What impact will legalizing gay marriage have on ...

what impact will legalizing gay marriage have on the general public what impact will legalizing gay marriage have on the gay ...
Submitted by Kat Parsons-Webb 3 months ago
  • viewed 147 times

Last answer posted 3 months ago by bigrickjr57


Why does Japan consider looking someone in the eye ...

Why does Japan consider looking someone in the eye is deviant behavior? Please I need help on this anyone!!!!!!
Submitted by dnowlin1 6 months ago
  • viewed 218 times

Last answer posted 6 months ago by harryvan



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

God, Nature,Past Universal History,the Great Flood

something about cooking food exerted influence on you. Qi. What is the nature of this influence . So qi is the interplay of Yin and Yang. This brings us back to the nature of Yin and Yang. Yin

Topic 1 - How Society Views Obesity Rethinking Thin - a book discussion

the book -- how our society views obesity and the obese. Two Quote: s from the book: “Overweight people have a condition that is unacceptable in our society,” said Kelly Brownell. And, he added, unlike

Gender and religious belief.

. It just seemed that the males were more rebellious in youth (in my culture) and hence more driven , male-dominant society but women are significant in decision making, though rebellion by women has
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog

Explore Related Videos

Second American Revolution: George Grant (5...

Question: Were the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution drafted to uphold the moral laws of God -- or were they Deistic humanist documents? If they were Christian documents, where have we gone so far off track? George Grant: King George was appalled at the American Revolution, not because he saw that there were colonists who were rebelling against the rule of parliament, but because he saw the covenantal implications. He called it the "Presbyterian Parson's Rebellion." He saw it as a continuation of the Scottish rebellion against his father some twenty years prior in which the covenanters rose up and established certain standards against which the king could not act. In other words, they were saying that there is but one Christ and Savior who wears the crown of all authority over all the nations of the earth. There is but one King of kings and Lord of lords. The king of Great Britain didn't much like that notion. He thought that he had a divine right to rule. The American Revolution was drawn from covenantal concepts that held the king in check and required action for justice when the king stepped beyond his bounds. A number of the Founding Fathers were influenced by Enlightenment ideas - ideas that ultimately came to be known as Deism or Unitarianism. Many were free thinkers. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson were examples of these men. They demonstrated the fruit of their free thought in their private lives. But in their public demeanor they were gloriously inconsistent. Benjamin Franklin was best known in the Constitutional Convention for calling for prayer that divine providence would guide all the proceedings of that great assembly. Thomas Jefferson read the Bible every day, even if he only read portions of it as he was wont to do. The fact is that the Founding Fathers lived in an inescapably Christian culture. And though they were not perfect men and though they did not always have their theology buttoned up and sewn up tight, they were men who lived in the midst of a Christian culture and reflected that Christian culture in much of their thinking. Even the most profligate of the unbelievers, Franklin, was deeply engaged in the theological debates of the day. The great evangelist, George Whitefield, was one of Benjamin Franklin's best friends and was constantly engaging Franklin in thinking through the implications of the Gospel. Deism was a seed thought that filtered into the proceedings and thinking of the Founding Fathers. But Christianity was the cultural backdrop, it was inescapable for them and the Christian capital that we have inherited 200 years later even this far away from them is evident. The Founding Fathers wanted to have it both ways. They wanted all the fruit of Christianity without confessing its root. Ultimately, that sowed seeds that in many generations to come would bring about a bitter harvest. To be honest, we have to look at the Founding Fathers and see grave mistakes. The Constitution begins with startling words to come out of a Christian environment, "We the People," rather than under God. They readily confessed their Enlightnment roots. There are problems with our Founding Fathers and with their thought. But they were not a contradistinction to the great Christian heritage of the west. They embraced and affirmed it, often times unconsciously, but nevertheless constantly in all that they did and all that they said and all that they passed on to us.

Noah Feldman: Politics and religion are...

http://www.ted.com Noah Feldman makes a searing case that both politics and religion -- whatever their differences -- are similar technologies, designed to efficiently connect and manage any group of people.

Porn

Midwest Teen Sex #13