Originated from
WalletPop

What should I do with my extra $ a month?

I am 46 years old, work PT  and I  want to contribute all my paycheck (( $300)) is what I make a month, but where I work ( hospital ) they will invest it for you..  WOuld $300 a month be worth it to invest? Or should I do something else with it?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

Order by
 
4 thumbs up

Before you donate your earnings to your employment locale, consider what long range living conditions in finances are you set up for. You're working part time, fine but are you coping with your budget expenses in this present economy? If you don't want to place it in your retirement fund, put it in the bank under an emergency account only in case there is an urgent need for cash. Or place it in a Christmas fund where you can't touch the savings until a certain time to buy gifts for people you know. Not trying to sound aloof, the hospital may have enough going through its coffers, what with county, state, federal assistance and taxes to boot where an investment of your funds will aid them and give you a percentage only. It'll be better to invest in yourself first.


Posted 2 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to deanna's question
Rated as
#1 out of 3
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
2170 thumbs up

The journey to an improved lifestyle begins with the first step.

Confident Lifestyle 

Confident Lifestyle Blog 

Tiptop Server 

 

I would advise checking with your plan administrator for your 401k, most employers will match your contribution dollar for dollar up to a certain amount. This is like free money for you. I would  invest in the 401k unless you are an experienced investor or have the time to learn to invest and the time to watch your portfolio.

 

Good luck and best wishes.


Posted 2 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to deanna's question
Rated as
#2 out of 3
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
17 thumbs up

#1Rated Diet Plan!!http://toystore.4idiots.hop.clickbank.net/ FAT

 Need Extra Cash? Can You Type? (Click Here) http://toystore.paidetc.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=JED

i would put 150. a month in 401k the other half in emergency funds until i had 2,000 and then the whole 300 in 401k,as long as they have access for you to see what it is being invested in.



Posted 1 month ago ( permalink )
In reply to deanna's question
Rated as
#3 out of 3
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



Sign in to participate

Got an answer for deanna? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Accepting you retirement now or later?

I am truning 55 this year, I have a previous job where my retirement (20+ years) "could" be given to me on a monthly basis of ...
Submitted by Ran Boughton 2 months ago
  • viewed 94 times

Last answer posted 2 months ago by brosen


Can we retire?

My husband and I are 55 and 56 and we are thinking about retiring in a couple of years. Our home is paid for, we have no debt ...
Submitted by Karla 28 days ago
  • viewed 36 times

Last answer posted 13 days ago by John F


Retire Early?

To keep retirement health benefits and recieve a lump sum pension payout, I was forced to retire at 49 with 31 yrs. I have ...
Submitted by michael 26 days ago
  • viewed 35 times

Last answer posted 14 days ago by John F



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Early Retirement and Retirement Planning Anxiety - LOL

Early Retirement and Retirement Planning Anxiety - LOL 13 rbull (10-Jun-2008 11:13 AM) been speaking with some retirement planners lately and have received a lot of conflicting...

go for retirement OR go on retirement

Hello, I was wondering which preposition should be used with the noun retirement: go on retirement OR go for retirement By the way, if both were acceptable, would there be any differences in meaning

Increase in Base Retirement Benefit for Delayed Retirement

The plan is a union/emplyer taft hartley pension plan. Normal retirement age is age 65. The plan is silent on delayed retirement. Question: If a participant delays receiving benefits past age 65
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog

Latest blog posts on WalletPop

Mortgages not the only thing hurting...

Filed under: Real Estate , Tax Move over, mortgage payment. You're being nudged out of the headlines. A new report from the Center for Housing Policy reports that almost every major expense associated with home ownership has shot up in the last ten years. (the study looks at the years between 1996 and 2006). The report, "Stretched Thin : The Impact of Rising Housing Expenses on America's Owners and Renters" lays out some sobering realities. But at least you know it's not just your imagination. (make sure to read the comments of this MarketWatch piece. Very interesting). Not only has the average mortgage payment increased by 46% in those ten years, but property taxes increased 66%. Utilities shot up 43%. Property insurance spiked 83%! Homeowner Incomes? Those went up by about 36% in those ten years, according to the survey (wonder if they collected that information from mortgage applications. "Liar Loans" were rife in the latter part of that decade). Renters aren't excluded from this pain, either, as landlords tend to pass their increased costs onto their tenants. According to the report, rents rose by about 51% over the period examined, while renter incomes only rose 31%. Apart from adding more gloomy news for your weekend, the report does make some recommendations. New housing needs to be far more energy efficient, and built closer to urban centers and public transportation. For more details, see the entire report here. Read | Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

What the meltdown means to me, a boomer...

Filed under: Retire , Recession My husband has a great job in a stable industry, but he's 63. Two years ago, we thought by this year he'd be officially retired -- doing a little consulting, but taking the winter off so we could spend the cold months somewhere warm. I have a home-based business that has always offered flexibility. Together, we were looking forward to a more leisurely life. The economic slowdown has made us rethink our plans. My husband continues to work at his old job -- usually 50 or 60 hours a week -- and I'm not slowing down either because we and those who depend on us need what we earn. We're not alone in this. A survey conducted for AARP found that nearly 20 percent of the people in our age group have postponed retirement. In most ways we're lucky. Overall, 66 percent of people older than 55 are having trouble paying for essential items such as food, gas and medicine. Fortunately, we don't have those troubles. But we do worry about our grown children who have found this tough economy a drag on independence. Our two oldest children are economically solid citizens. They got their careers off the ground before the economy soured. But our younger ones face bigger challenges.Continue reading What the meltdown means to me, a boomer with grown children Permalink | Email this | Comments

Fantastic Freebies: Seattle's Best Coffee...

Filed under: Food , Fantastic Freebies Sure, there may be some quibbling out there about whether Seattle's Best Coffee is really Seattle's best (and as it's now owned by Seattle native Starbucks, well, that's just a conundrum, ain't it?). But free coffee is free coffee, and I, for one, am not going to quibble about that. Getting a free sample is as easy as filling out your name, address and email -- you'll get to choose between Henry's Blend ("uncommonly smooth"), Seattle's Best Blend ("captivating aroma and a smooth finish") and Vanilla Bean ("perfectly combines smooth coffee flavor with vanilla"). Is Seattle's Best Coffee "a whole different cup"? Soon, you'll know. Every day, WalletPop will be bringing you information about a fantastic freebie. Like what you see? Check back tomorrow for more! Permalink | Email this | Comments

I never thought I'd cry when looking at my...

Filed under: Retire The unthinkable has happened. The sight of my portfolio of investments has reduced me to tears. Who wouldn't be crying when looking at 40% of their value gone this year? Even worse than the sheer magnitude of my losses... what those losses mean to me and to others. I'm lucky. I don't need my retirement funds for at least 20 years or more. There is no doubt in my mind that I will have recovered all the lost value well before that. I worry about those who don't have years to wait, though. They're the big losers in all of this. Think about all the Baby Boomers who scrimped and saved to get to retirement, only to see their hard earned dollars massively reduced in a period of a few weeks. Some Boomer friends of mine who were invested more conservatively have seen their portfolio drop "only" 15%. Imagine the impact of that over 20 years of retirement. These retirees need to draw on their accounts now, and can't wait to recover value. The portfolios of all retirees are going to be depleted much quicker than they thought. Who would have thought that the people with all their money in certificates of deposit earning 3% or 4% would now look like geniuses? They were missing out on stock market gains, but now are feeling pretty good about the fact that their principal investment was protected. This is depressing. And each day I tell myself that the bottom has to be near; that my investments can't go down much further than they already have. And each day Wall Street surprises me with a hefty drop in my value. There's not much to be done about my ailing retirement fund, other than to work hard and keep saving for the retirement that will hopefully still be funded when I get there. Tracy L. Coenen, CPA, MBA, CFE performs fraud examinations and financial investigations for her company Sequence Inc. Forensic Accounting , and is the author of Essentials of Corporate Fraud . Permalink | Email this | Comments