• Answers
  • Web

What is the most expensive religion?

In any religion some aspects cost money: rituals, special clothing and "offerings" are just a small part of any religion. But what is the religion that demands the most expensive tributes from its followers?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

29 Posted Answers
Order by

 
140 helpful answers

Jeremiah 23:19
Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked

Sent them a sign, sent them a sign, sent them a sign, but they closed their eyes.

But they closed their eyes...

Nowhere to hide, nowhere to run
He prophesied this day would come
You can close your eyes when he sends you the sign
You can just pretend that you have plenty of time
But when you're caught in the eye of the storm

Nowhere to turn as the thunder crashes
So many time you were warned
Now you're caught in the eye of the storm
Apocalypse stands at the door
You're caught in the eye of the storm

Ages ago, voices so cruel
"Noah" they cried, "You're such a fool"
And still today, skeptics abound
Until the water will cover the ground
And they are caught in the eye of the storm

Nowhere to turn as the thunder crashes
So many time you were warned
Now you're caught in the eye of the storm
Apocalypse stands at the door
You're caught in the eye of the storm

You could give him your heart
While you still have the time
You can give him your soul
You can give him your mind
You can fall on your knees
You could cry out "Save me"

One day when the lightning crashes
One day when the thunder rolls
One day when apocalypse is standing knockin' at your door
You'll be safe in the arms of Jesus
You'll be safe forever more
You'll be praising him forever
What a glorious reward
You'll be safe with the Lord
Not caught in the eye of the storm

Caught in the eye of the storm

Nowhere to turn as the thunder crashes
So many time you were warned
Now you're caught in the eye of the storm
Apocalypse stands at the door
You're caught in the eye of the storm

Helpful?(0)
Rated #12 out of 29
 
140 helpful answers

Jeremiah 23:19
Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked

WorldNetDaily.com A Free Press For A Free People

Just 'fabulous': 'Gay' man sues Bible publisher for this ...

A homosexual man is suing a third national Bible publisher for "mental anguish" after he says the company published Bibles with a negative connotation toward homosexuals.

Read the latest now on WND.com.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #13 out of 29
 
331 helpful answers

Let's see now......an adulterer can sue the Bible because it says "Thou shalt not commit adultery" and that makes him feel guilty and troubled.

Great! Now let's see about the other 9 commandments, and don't forget all the other restrictions all through the Bible.

Hey lawyers, here's a gold mine!

 
9 helpful answers

~ The Heart is the hub of all sacred places, go there and roam ~

Well, since God created "gay" people also, plus there is no negativity in the Perfect Mind of God... it only stands to reason that either A) the bible has been distorted when it comes to the concept of God condemning anyone AND/OR ...B) people READING the bible are misinterpreting its meaning... which happens a lot actually. *(As when Jesus says ~ I AM the ONE and the Way ~ some people STILL assume Jesus was referencing his physical form of water and a few minerals instead of His ONE Christ Consciousness... which is Formless and ALL Pervasive. A simple misunderstanding with HUGE, and perhaps for some.. convenient repercussions ) It is important to consider that ANY True Scripure not only needs to be written by one who is FULLY seated in Christ/Pure Consciousness but also MUST be READ by someone who is themselves in that Self same State of Perfection. Not too many can claim that perspective. *( And if they DID have it..they wouldn't bother to claim it.) EVEN the one doing ANY translation must also be anchored in this supreme and RARE state. It is not something that can be approached using the intellect alone. The fact is, there is MUCH hidden meaning in such writings. Not "hidden" on purpose but by default .. ~ just as a blind man cannot see the sun rise even as it is right in front of them ~ MOST human "eyes" are still veiled by the impure ego. Of course to even SUGGEST to the impure ego that it is in fact STILL in IGNORANCE of The ONE Supreme TRUTH .. makes the ego angry and feel insulted. THAT's how you know you're dealing with the impure ego and NOT the Divine Mind. The veiling ego gets VERY defensive. Humility is NOT one of its strong points. So.. my suggestion to this fellow who's EGO feels "victimized" by this publisher... why not just stop reading the book if it does not ring true for you? Instead why not focus on accepting the Perfection within yourself instead of rejecting the perceived imperfection of others? Why waste your precious time arguing with those who have no real understanding? Instead, empower yourself and go WITHIN.. as Jesus, and other supremely rare Grace Bestowing BEings like him, have always suggested. No religion or group owns Jesus, owns God, owns Truth Absolute. THAT ONE is already WITHIN you.. just waiting for the right time to come forth and be RE-Cognized. The play of the mind is just a distraction. THE Supreme Truth is REVEALED from within. The function of GRACE is not to simply get one to some heaven but to REVEAL to the veiled mind its TRUE SELF, which is the SAME in ALL. This, and not physical death is the True Death those such as Jesus reference.. Death of the impure ego.... That moment when we merge FULLY into The Christ /Perfect Mind .. which doesn't give a hoot about sexual orientation. The point is that whatever we "do" .. or better put, THINK we are doing, in this dream of life, should be done from a place of LOVE, respect, and compassion for ALL involved. That is ALL that matters. So.. sue or do not sue.. from a place of LOVE . Truly... whether one wins such suits or loses them will NOT bring one any closer to Truth Absolute, which is really the WHOLE Point of one's existance. My suggestion is .. do not bother to get mired in the petty controversies of this mundane world since they just serve to create more and more delusion for the finite mind to feed on. Think on the Pure indwelling Divine ONE alone... where there is NO fault, NO imperfection, NO judgment..but only love ~ only LOVE ~ ~ ~ ONLY LOVE Peace, Faith

 
290 helpful answers

 Be Thankful

 Speak softly

 Let your love shine...

Faith, I hope you stay with us for a long time.  Your answers are thought provoking and interesting.  Why do you think it takes some people so long to grasp the ultimate truth?  

Helpful?(0)
Rated #14 out of 29
 
DYK
8 helpful answers

Faith wrote:   Well, since God created "gay" people also, plus there is no negativity in the Perfect Mind of God... it only stands to reason that either A) the bible has been distorted when it comes to the concept of God condemning anyone AND/OR

 

 

DYK writes:    .....hard to distort the black and white like, ".....homosexuals must be killed...." or "....you may have slaves; you may buy the children of those who are not Israelites and they will be your property for life and this property can be willed to your future generations..."  What's to distort?  Just these commands, and many like them, they play havoc with the wishful assertion of "no negativity".

 

Faith wrote:   ...B) people READING the bible are misinterpreting its meaning... which happens a lot actually.

 DLK writes:  The trouble with kind of statement is that it is the usual "I am right, you are wrong," sentiment.  "They" don't get it, only "I" get it, has been the most dangerous assertion in history.

 

 Faith wrote:    It is important to consider that ANY True Scripure not only needs to be written by one who is FULLY seated in Christ/Pure Consciousness but also MUST be READ by someone who is themselves in that Self same State of Perfection. Not too many can claim that perspective. *( And if they DID have it..they wouldn't bother to claim it.)

 

DLK writes:  The above doesn't have any meaning.  Ascribing perfection is the purest of religious fiction.  It is a facile and false method of giving a source its mystery and grandeur, when it is merely a text written by men, quite simple men, on the whole, men who were steeped in their culture's traditions and superstitions.  As Thomas Jefferson wrote, there is no difference between what is in the pages of the Bible than there is in any other written material describing any other belief system.  They, he wrote, are all alike, founded upon myth, superstition, fable, and folklore.  An honest reader reading the Bible can draw no other conclusion, whether he be "perfect" or not.

 

Faith writes:    EVEN the one doing ANY translation must also be anchored in this supreme and RARE state.

 

DYK writes:  This kind of claim is empty.  In fact, it begins to float into a kind of religious "insanity" which is far too often a problem.  It is a claim that has no support, no possible proof, and absolutely no merit other than, perhaps, the claimant believing the claim.  That willingness to believe skirts the "insanity" edge.  To project "perfection states" is to enter the area of the occult, to climb in bed with the idea of "beyond the realm of human comprehension".  Ponder that, please.

 

Faith wrote:   It is not something that can be approached using the intellect alone.

DLK writes:  When reading the words of men decribing events, interminglings with a god, and espousing ways to believe, much of it involving the fantastical, what else is there but the brain to work it all out?

 

Faith wrote:    The fact is, there is MUCH hidden meaning in such writings. Not "hidden" on purpose but by default ..

 

DYK writes:  No, this only goes to the various interpretations of various people.  If there were "hidden" meanings, by default (a false premise), then those meanings would not ever be known, since they're hidden.  It all goes back to "I know" and "You don't", when nothing is known except a person seeing what he wishes to in order to support his own versions.  The "hidden meanings" assertions goes to cop out, much of the time as a defense against the obvious, that the Bible is no different than other explanations of any other religion.

 

Faith wrote:     ~ just as a blind man cannot see the sun rise even as it is right in front of them ~ MOST human "eyes" are still veiled by the impure ego.

 

DLK writes:  Except, of course, the pure eyes of Faith, this poster, who is apparently claiming to be of the Chosen.  Maybe not, though it seems to be the direction of the proposals.  Is "Faith" perfect?  This question is not a "dig" but a question that seeks an answer.

Faith wrote:   Of course to even SUGGEST to the impure ego that it is in fact STILL in IGNORANCE of The ONE Supreme TRUTH .. makes the ego angry and feel insulted.

 

DLK writes:   Insulting intelligence is always a problem, especially when the insults come from an occult setting.  For example:  "impure ego....still in ignorance..." has absolutely no meaning, whatsoever.  To think it does, means the thinker is awash with gullibility, a victim of an inability to reason, to think in a critical manner.  This kind of "impure ego....." bathed in ignorance is what can be described as "psycho-babble."

 

Faith wrote:   THAT's how you know you're dealing with the impure ego and NOT the Divine Mind. The veiling ego gets VERY defensive. Humility is NOT one of its strong points.

 

DYK writes:  Now, just as the general personal god has human traits and attributes, a ego gets the same anthropomorphized treatment.  The ego becomes almost a person.  (Not only "ego" but "soul" undergoes the same kind of tortured descriptions)

 

Faith wrote:   So.. my suggestion to this fellow who's EGO feels "victimized" by this publisher... why not just stop reading the book if it does not ring true for you?

 

DYK writes:  But this would be an important reason to keep on reading.  Since it is supposed to be from the divine, supposed to be inerrant, supposed to have 'hidden' meanings, supposed to have the secrets, why not discover the truth that it is none of those things?  Keep reading.  Just like so many before who came to understand the truth about the Bible, like a Jefferson, a Franklin, a Lincoln, a Sagan--they kept on reading the Bible.  They came to it intellectually pure, pristine, not loaded with pre-conceived beliefs, or weighed down by the occult-minded.

 

Faith wrote:    Instead why not focus on accepting the Perfection within yourself instead of rejecting the perceived imperfection of others?

 

DYK writes:  This kind of pronouncement is indicative, again, of the occult.  Meaningless to an nth degree.  But to some, particularly the gullible, particularly the untrained minds, this kind of verbiage "sounds" compelling, as it masquerades as intelligence.

 

Faith wrote:    Why waste your precious time arguing with those who have no real understanding?

 

DYK writes:  Yes, "they" don't get it, only "you" get it.

 

Faith wrote:    Instead, empower yourself and go WITHIN.. as Jesus, and other supremely rare Grace Bestowing BEings like him, have always suggested.

 

DYK writes:  Sure, just do it.  Whatever the process is, just do it.  Or just as good, perhaps, do a little yoga; go to Barnes and Noble to the self-help section; get a pet.

As far as those rare Grace Bestowing Beings, who might they be?  Someone like a Marshall Applewhite?  Could there have been any more serene "Within" people on earth?  Check out the Heaven's Gaters. 

 

Faith wrote:    No religion or group owns Jesus, owns God, owns Truth Absolute. THAT ONE is already WITHIN you.. just waiting for the right time to come forth and be RE-Cognized. The play of the mind is just a distraction. THE Supreme Truth is REVEALED from within. The function of GRACE is not to simply get one to some heaven but to REVEAL to the veiled mind its TRUE SELF, which is the SAME in ALL. This, and not physical death is the True Death those such as Jesus reference.. Death of the impure ego.... That moment when we merge FULLY into The Christ /Perfect Mind .. which doesn't give a hoot about sexual orientation. The point is that whatever we "do" .. or better put, THINK we are doing, in this dream of life, should be done from a place of LOVE, respect, and compassion for ALL involved. That is ALL that matters. So.. sue or do not sue.. from a place of LOVE . Truly... whether one wins such suits or loses them will NOT bring one any closer to Truth Absolute, which is really the WHOLE Point of one's existance. My suggestion is .. do not bother to get mired in the petty controversies of this mundane world since they just serve to create more and more delusion for the finite mind to feed on. Think on the Pure indwelling Divine ONE alone... where there is NO fault, NO imperfection, NO judgment..but only love ~ only LOVE ~ ~ ~ ONLY LOVE Peace, Faith

 

DYK writes:  language characterized by circumlocution and jargon, usually hard to understand: "Gobbledygook"

Faith writes:   bother to get mired in the petty controversies of this mundane world since they just serve to create more and more delusion for the finite mind to feed on

 

DYK writes:  And do what?  Be serene?  Float?  Waft?  What does a finite mind do if it's not infinite?  Look inward?  Dive into the caverns that house ego and soul, chastize them for their non humility, their non concept of the Divine? 

How does one step outside the bounds of what it is to be human?  To be finite?  To be a part of a natural world?  Are the answers the occult?  To claim?  To pretend?  To accept illusions that swiftly, unfortunately, can devolve into the delusional?

There is usually only one route outside of natural, since the unnatural, the paranormal, the supernatural, do not exist, and that route is insanity on the edge.  Consider why there are prefixes in front of natural--un, para, super.  They are there because they are concepts that have no bases.  The known world is that of the natural.  All of the other kinds of worlds are that of the UN-natural, i.e., the fantasy worlds of the imaginations.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #15 out of 29
 
290 helpful answers

 Be Thankful

 Speak softly

 Let your love shine...

DYK,   Truth is available to all.  It has been offered for thousands of years, by enlightened people who have been eager to share. But, as in your case, it has provoked ill feelings in your heart and mind. 

 Truth can be found, discovered, learned, but it cannot be explained to the satisfaction of some people.  It is better for you if you do your own seeking and finding. I hope we are here to hear you sing the praises of the Ultimate, Absolute Truth when you discover it for yourself.

Ultimate = beyond which further analysis, division, etc. cannot be made;elemental, fundamental; primary.

Absolute = the independent, unrestricted, and perfect Being;God; generally with the; as, the power of the Absolute.

 

 
DYK
8 helpful answers

NJOY wrote:    DYK,   Truth is available to all. 

 

DYK writes:  No, versions of truths are offered and have been dime a dozen.  One person's truth is not necessarily another person's truth.  Here's the "Truth":  There are many, many claims and versions of Truth.  You may claim a "Truth" but you can't support your Truth other than your claim.  And it the Truth were available for all, in a package you claim, you and I would not be discussing it.  The Truth would Be.

 

NJOY wrote: It has been offered for thousands of years, by enlightened people who have been eager to share.

 

DYK writes:  Your contention resides in a quagmire of pure and mere assertions.  For one, what creates "enlightened" other than a claim of the enlightened, or a claim of the followers of the enlightened?  Was a Paul enlightened?  Who claimed that he was the Messenger from God?  He did.  Who claimed he'd been taken up into heaven for a little spell?  He did.  Who claimed that while in heaven he had witnessed and had been told all kinds of really, really special and secretive things, and that he was sworn to secrecy when he was returned to earth?  He did.   Another "enlightened", Isaiah, claimed, while he was disrobing, that God had told him to take off those clothes and run about naked for three whole years?  Enlightened?

You see, you just can't use "enlightened" without being able to substantiate the enlightenment.  Was Marshall Applewhite enlightened?  Then, after you identify who was enlightened, you are then obligated to explain what the enlightenment is, and how they were so enlightened.  In other words, you have to be responsible for coherence and logic.

 NJOY wrote:   But, as in your case, it has provoked ill feelings in your heart and mind. 

 

DYK writes: This kind of statement is very irresponsible, since it is a deflective method, even if oblique, to "attack the messenger".  It would be more appropriate not to make this kind of analysis based upon pre-conceived thinking and deal, intellectually with the arguments or proposals.  When this tact comes from the typical believer, what is sure to follow is something like, "I feel sorry for you."  Consider how condescending that approach is, and really is comical in the sense that the one who goe to the messenger, or goes to the sympathy approach, doesn't realize that every other single believer of every other single belief system is saying the same thing about him or her (or NJOY).  "You don't believe as I do?  Boy, do I ever feel sorry for you.....and you are just angry againt God, etc..."  Never does it dawn upon the true believer's mind that the person who does not believe does so because of real, substantial reasons.  Reasons the operative term:  There are no bona find reasons to believe in reincarnation, in Allah, in Jehovah, in God, in Satan, and all that jazz.  What religions and god assertions do you, NJOY, not believe in?  What are your reasons for non-belief?  I bet most, if not all, of your reasons would be my own reasons for not believing in your versions of whatever you think Truth is.

 

NJOY wrote:   Truth can be found, discovered, learned, but it cannot be explained to the satisfaction of some people.  It is better for you if you do your own seeking and finding.

 

DYK writes:  This is a total cop out.  If there is a "Truth" to be had, discovered, found, known, shared, then it can absolutely be explained.  The reason Truth can't be explained is because it hasn't been discovered, and you speak of it in spider web terms, in metaphorical senses trying to ascertain the abstract.  In effect, you think you can do something cerebrally that you cannot do.  No one can.

NJOY wrote:   I hope we are here to hear you sing the praises of the Ultimate, Absolute Truth when you discover it for yourself.

DYK writes:  Sorry, Njoy, but this is nothing but a cop out, nothing but a superstitious dance around what is known as reality.  You haven't a clue as to what you're talking about, evident by your inability to explain, to share, to prove.  This is one of the main reasons you thought Faith was so astute, she or she was using the fabric of language with no meaning.  Faith's presentation could be the poster child for religious nonsense, although there are many such candidates.

 

NJOY wrote:   Ultimate = beyond which further analysis, division, etc. cannot be made;elemental, fundamental; primary.

 

DYK writes:  And?  If you've arrived at, and identified, "ultimate", you should be able to explain, identify, support, prove what it is and why it's "ultimate".  You can't do this.

NJOY wrote:    Absolute = the independent, unrestricted, and perfect Being;God; generally with the; as, the power of the Absolute.

DYK writes:  Which is, and remains, assertion.  I can go to any and all religions and they will ASSERT the same kind of thing.  And where does it go from their assertions?  Nowhere.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #16 out of 29

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for BigRedEd? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

God, Faith, Religion, or Scripture?

There's a song,(Country & Western i think) in which the singer has a deck of playing cards. With each card that is pulled from the ...
Submitted by gazXbrum   4 months ago.
  • viewed 311 times
Last answer posted 3 months ago by Whirlwindflower


Q:

Is free will an illusion that must be postulated to enable the effective functioning of religion and criminal justice?

Isn't free will an illusion that is primarily promoted by the religious establishment? Every physical phenomenon has a cause and ...
Submitted by Physicalist   19 days ago.
  • viewed 302 times


Q:

Which religion is considered having the most ...

Which religion is considered having the most observant believers? Can there be an answer for such a question?
Submitted by Raydan   3 years ago.
  • viewed 1547 times
Last answer posted 6 days ago by peterseaford



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

An Example of Wrong Theology?

Of theology which are not the Gospel but are Progressive socialism. Listen to this and this is a perfect and loses faith in Christ because what's the point in believing in a flawed contradictory book " in order to make their erroneous claims of theology which are not the Gospel but are Progressive

Winning This War Requires Language of Faith

Into a post-faith society — disdainful of religion and confident in the primacy of reason alone motivated by relentless theology. By failing to speak in the same language, it has no weapons Quote: : As the West evolves into a post-faith society — disdainful of religion and confident

Don't Pray For America

The prosperity gospel and Dominion theology are offshoots of post-millennialism. The Post Tribulation Rapture trib views that denies imminence as well. Replacement Theology was to deny that the re-birth of Israel have been tainted by replacement theology, and hardly any study prophecy. That leaves
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License