It has been said that if we do not know evil ...

It has been said that if we do not know evil, there's no way we can feel, understand, appreciate and enjoy good; that without "evil", "good" makes no sense; then evil turns out to be the reason for good.

Is it really so? 

Are terror, cruelty, sadism, etc the necessary evil for us to enjoy the good? Do evil-doers carry some sort of nobility with themselves because of the evil they produce which on its turn would make us appreciate the good? 

Would you like to answer or comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

Order by
 
23 thumbs up

Dear Drabsv,

I was adopted and brought up in a loving home.  We attended church whenever services were offered.  My father owned a general merchandise store and gave food and supplies to anyone who couldn't afford them.  My mother was a school teacher and gave of herself to all her students, the school, parents, etc., always there to give a helping hand.  I only saw good in my life and in the world around me.  I didn't know evil on earth, only what was taught in the Bible regarding the devil and his wily ways.  I realize that was a very simplistic, idyllic life, but evil was not necessary or a reason for good.  Good just "was."

Not that we shouldn't fight evil in all ways we can, but one's intentions should be of a pure nature, not self-serving.  The "good" is not as recognizable as when I grew up, and "evil" has manifested itself exponentially.  One the consequence of the other?  Today, I'm afraid too many people claim to fight evil in order to appear or claim to be good, not knowing what true "good" is.  This is true of freedom-fighters as well as terrorists.  Most terrorists believe they are doing "good" because of their own religious beliefs.  Those of their sect would probably agree.  Those fighting terrorists believe they are doing "good."  Therefore, in a philosophical sense, both good and evil, like beauty, is in the eye (or heart) of the beholder. 

True evil-doers, like terrorists and sadists, have no nobility in themselves.  Nobility requires a high moral standard, and no evil should be required for reasonable men and women to appreciate good.

 


Posted 3 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to drabsv's question
Rated as
Best Answer
0
2

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
7 thumbs up

As a child, I remember my life being very happy and joyful for the most part.  The evil that may have existed around me was shielded by mom and dad and other loved ones. As an adult, currently, I have experienced high levels of evil in my environment to my dismay.  I also see evil increase in this world at high and rapid levels.  It can either suffocate us if we are not strong enough or don't have a balance of enough good in our lives, or close our minds to the good that there is.  I see no nobility at all in evil-doers.  Yes, I also do see evil's existence as a way to accentuate the good, and even strive for the good a little harder.  I've often wondered what the Kingdom of God to come will be like.  If it contains ALL good, will humans be bored and unappreciative?  Yours is a very good question.  For me, I wouldn't mind a world made up entirely of good and be child-like, free, and joyful again.  I'm old enough to have seen both sides, and I know where I want to be.


Posted 3 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to drabsv's question
Rated as
Best Answer
0
2

Helpful?

line
line
line



Sign in to participate

Got an answer for drabsv? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Is it true that if one had been the victim of ...

Is it true that if one had been the victim of violent behaviour he would not be likely to inflict the same type of violent ...
Submitted by drabsv 5 months ago
  • viewed 342 times

Last answer posted 5 months ago by MEKKMan


Need a help

hii my sister of age 26 years, loved a guy 3 years back, my parents were not supportive to this, later because of this she lost ...
Submitted by Bharath 1 month ago
  • viewed 78 times

Last answer posted 1 month ago by girl
Asked about "Get personal advice"


How much of a persons personality is believed to ...

How much of a persons personality is believed to be genetic/biological?
Submitted by Blanche 7 months ago
  • viewed 622 times

Last answer posted 4 months ago by Missy



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

21st century philosophy is all about merging sci + ethics

appealing about the idea. The technology may be 21st century but the philosophy sounds... be 21st century but the philosophy sounds more like 19th century eugenics. Like that...

The philosophy video lecture thread

. All types of philosophy are welcome, mind, ethics, analytic philosophy, whatever. Just give a bit The philosophy video lecture thread I know there's quite a lot of philosophy heads on here. Well

So, what is Ethics, anyway?

. I was reading a bit of Russell's Elements of Ethics, and I know that he's quite a fluctuating to the Ethicists here would be: 1. What do you think about Ethics as a subject? What similarities and (a myriad
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
Copyright © 2006-2008, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License