SimonStudio

Man who lives in glass house dresses in basement

 

Is it ethical to follow people on TWITTER that don't want to be followed?

Last night I left three of my AVATARS in loop. I lost around 85 followers.

I shouldn't of let my cat try to talk me into bed. he kept on begging. I didn't realize the feed would haywire.  My aliases on TWITTER are listed on my website. I'm keeping it transparent so it doesn't bite me in the ass.  Eventually I assume most of you will unfollow n block me... but by that point I will have perfected the craft of puppet accounts! puppet accounts can be fed N2 a root account, where I can follow all fools that thought they could block me. there is NO blocking! the final account will take the RSS feed of multiple accounts and run it N2 one account. you will not realize the new account is me. twitter is about information, not privacy. this should scare off all the Betty eMOMs into a panopticon surveillance phobia. I realize that heirarchy is part of life's function, but as a thinking person I have to make sure my reputation has thorns. it is less important to me if you follow me or not. what is important is I can follow enemies. this is all about following people that block me. that is it. I don't care if they pay attention or not. I'm not the "BUGBLATTER BEAST" if you don't follow me, I'm still dangerous to values that have not been tried. I know u can't defeat logic. I don't know anyone here enough to know if they r enemies yet, what I do know is most people unfollow n "block" because of nothing. It could be tyranny, but I didn't create TWITTER, and if you don't like it... YOU CAN'T BLOCK me. those r my thorns. u can UNFOLLOW with the button, but if u anger me I will enter ur community n convince ur friends that ur wrong. no more BLOCKING. interesting feeds r created by those whose opinions r not popular. they block when questioned. I want in. I want 2 learn n dialogue. I know I don't have 2 like or agree 2 benefit. I love reading Nietzsche n Machiavelli. I assume they would block. my cycle last night was not intentional. I already realized it was theoretically possible. I was trying to filter it out. the idea is to cycle and control multiple avatars from a central one. not create a loop. if I can accomplish this then I can speak to those that block me. speak to the dead so to speak. theoretically I can make god speak. end result was creating a loop.
Is it ethical to follow people on TWITTER that don't want to be followed? 

 


Answer this question
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

4 Posted Answers
Order by

 
265 answers
37 helpful answers

Man who lives in glass house dresses in basement

 

you logged in for that? fuckoffanddie?

 

dyerbrookme agrees with me.

http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.com/2008/05/thejesus-thegod-and-qru-loop.html 

  I'm not an absolutist. I don't believe in a pure open society and I don't think it would be wise to make one. 


The reason my system exists is to show@mailourmilitary how easy it is to create an account on twitter and cycle information somewhere. It was an argument aimed at this group of people who were using group cyber-bully techniques to silence any who spoke out against@mailourmilitary. I couldn't see any other way to defeat a group of people who tried to bombard they're opinions into truth by getting military personnel to write me and tell me how much they liked hearing from TWITTER people in Iraq. I felt for the soldiers, but this was just a ruse for a few lonely ladies to feel good about themselves and did not take the needs of the military into high regard.
Read More here:

WHY TWITTER PEOPLE SHOULDN'T EMAIL THE TROOPS 
Posted 2008-05-04T07:08:58Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #1 out of 4
 
14 answers
1 helpful answer

Wow, I have no idea about most of what you said. And you answered your own question! There must be some Twitter/Yedda subculture I'm not aware of.

Anyway, I only block spammers - people who are following 1,200 people and nobody following them.  But if I genuinely wanted to keep real people from seeing my Twitter updates, I'd make them private.  Seems easy enough.

Posted 2008-05-09T22:00:40Z
woofiegrrl was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #2 out of 4
 
265 answers
37 helpful answers

Man who lives in glass house dresses in basement

 

yes I do believe it is ethical to surveilance blockers of Twitter.  I wasn't asking what I felt.  I'm asking what you feel.  I wrote the question like the way someone on TWITTER would write.

 

If you understand bocking then obviously you do too!  Yes you are welcome to make your tweets private, but you can't stop people from creating new accounts to watch you.  I follow a lot of people I disagree with.  I am on TWITTER to learn and my primary reason for being there is for information.  Some people go to TWITTER thinking it is the next MySpace, but there are no friends there.  As a result I can follow you better as an unknown then as a person you hate.  I feel this is the architecture of TWITTER.  I like it... and I am going to use it as such.

 

I am now on my 22nd account.  

The more the beeee---aaacches BLOCK... the more accounts I will have

 

;-P 
Posted 2008-05-10T13:24:19Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #3 out of 4
 

Don't worry. If people don't want somebody follow  them, they can block. Usually people block spammers, people who keep bothering them, and who are abusive and rude. The Twitter Technique
Posted 2009-07-18T04:22:24Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #4 out of 4

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for SimonStudio? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Ethical issue of "A Time To Kill"

ethical issue of "A Time To Kill"
Submitted by RLawstuen   2 years ago.
  • 1 answer
  • viewed 776 times
Last answer posted 2 years ago by IsabellaLily


Q:

Ethics

why might an individual with high ethical standards act less eithically in business than in his personal life
Submitted by Lamisha   5 months ago.
  • 3 answers
  • viewed 92 times
Last answer posted 5 months ago by DrStrangelove


Q:

What does it mean to be ethical,

What does it mean to be ethical?
Submitted by kateyln   2 years ago.
  • 3 answers
  • viewed 2163 times
Last answer posted 2 years ago by brosen



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Ethics from self-interest

Moral relativism, evolution and game theory. What it can't account for is our empathy for the disabled that minarchism is not a good equilibria. The reasons that humans (or wolves, or any other social animal midstream into a society. Ethics are a social concern. You are right about the idea of this notion (self

The problem with conspiracy theories

To members of a religious sect. Religious and political philosophies, however, may incorporate valid ethical Relativism. Since conspiracists do not understand the methods for reaching a correct conclusion, all of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose

Starbucks cup quote on ID/evolution

Impact on traditional social values has not been as benign as its advocates would like us to believe . Despite the efforts of its modern defenders to distance themselves from its baleful social . The truth of a theory implies no ethical benefits from its acceptance. To spark debate here, I am "pro
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License