• Answers
  • Web
Originated from
The Washington Times

GSo Pelosi is paying her husband with ...

GSo Pelosi is paying her husband with inappropriate funds. Dodd/Obama received a ton of cash from fannie mae and freddie mac. Rangel is being investigated on real estate tax fraud. Obama has a past relationship with Ayres. Questionable voting practices in Ohio with ACORN. Acorn, with Obama, forced banks and savings and loans to give mortgages to people who couldn't afford them. (they sued Citibank). Clinton (Bill) eased regulations in 1999 making it easier to get a mortgage, starting our current mess. Why do we want these people running our country? and why are people so fired up about the democratic party? Its criminal


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

3 Posted Answers
Order by

 
o
14 helpful answers

 

 

BETTER BE CAREFUL JAYBRIGHT . SHES ONLY 2 HEARTBEATS

AWAY FROM PRESIDENT HHHH EEEE LLLL PPPP

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she supported banning last year.

Financial Leasing Services Inc. (FLS), owned by Paul F. Pelosi, has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's "PAC to the Future" over the PAC's nine-year history.

The payments have quadrupled since Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer of his wife's committee in 2007, Federal Election Commission records show. FLS is on track to take in $48,000 in payments this year alone - eight times as much as it received annually from 2000 to 2005, when the committee was run by another treasurer.

Lawmakers' frequent use of campaign donations to pay relatives emerged as an issue in the 2006 election campaigns, when the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal gave Democrats fodder to criticize Republicans such as former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas and Rep. John T. Doolittle of California for putting their wives on their campaign and PAC payrolls for fundraising work.

Related links:

Stephen Dinan and Jennifer Harper: "Bailout" by another name sounds sweeter

Wesley Pruden: A job for the right woman

Hoyer, Blunt hopeful of progress on rescue bill

Last year, Mrs. Pelosi supported a bill that would have banned members of Congress from putting spouses on their campaign staffs. The bill - which passed the House in a voice vote but did not get out of a Senate committee - banned not only direct payments by congressional campaign committees and PACs to spouses for services including consulting and fundraising, but also "indirect compensation," such as payments to companies that employ spouses.

 
1 helpful answer

The majority of the american people elected these crooks they should all be thrown in jail and the ones that put them in office remember you reap what you sow. They  need to deoderize washington d.C. And all the politicians down there disgracing our great nation!!!!  Pelosi is a disgrace but the media hushed that up about her paying her husband gee i wonder why?? I feel sorry for america if she raises up and roars like a lion because washington d.C. Would get the cleansing that it deserves. Gee i wonder how obama got all that money to get put in the whitehouse???  Wonder why that has never been investigated for the american people????? Wonder why obamas cabinet hasn't been investigated???

 
59 helpful answers

There is no way to happiness... Happiness is the WAY!

All the talk about Torture, which is another subject that the American people are going to go crazy over.

Not only is Pelosi giving a job to her husband. Diane Finestein sent a letter to congress about her husband and year back. Now his bank handles the foreclosures for homes. I believe this is a conflict of interest !!!

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for jaybright? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Remember when it used to be Democrats vs, Republicans, rather than Democrats...

I realize there never was a good old days when Democrats all agreed on anything. We used to have . And during the Bush years, there was Democrats who wanted to oppose the GOP vs. the Democrats who Republicans used to stand for. Democrats always stood for the working class, the underclasses and the poor

Primarily for Democrats - Should the Democrats throw Lieberman Out?...

Association with the Democrats. And before others start, this would NOT mean that the Democrats would Today a couple of different groups are delivering petitions to the Democratic Party calling association with the Democrats. And before others start, this would NOT mean that the Democrats would lose...

Why are the Democrats caving into the Democrats on health reform?

This doesn't make any sense to me. The Democrats control the House, Senate, and the Executive platform plank), are the Democrats. But, by just observing this party in action during Bush's years continuing to make concessions to the Democrats..." What?And no party, but their own, has the numbers
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License