You didn't prove anything.  Nor did you address any of my comments.  All you did was stand on a soapbox with deaf ears, blindly preaching your ignorance and hatred.  

Great hairy Ned!  Manifesto has to be the single most unsavory influence on people I have ever seen.

It is not bad enough that he openly demands "Special access" to your kids, but in the process, he demands outright communism if not Marxist/Stalinist anarchy!

If you want to see wanton bloodshed, just follow Manifesto's advice.  If you want to see bloody chaos, just listen to Manifesto!  If you want to see all your hopes, dreams, and the people you love slowly tortured and destroyed, just let Manifesto get a word in edgewise.

Communist fanatics will do absolutely anything to misrepresent their totalitarian "cause" to naive young people, who don't know what these racist hate mongers purposefully conceal.  Then, once they control the naive young person, they also control his money.

That is the final outcome of that sort of game: money and nothingbut, and these people are so brazen that they consider it acceptable to lie out both of their totalitarian faces about it.

The misery is that communists always play games.  But they also lose those games.  For instance, whern Manifesto resigned the debate, he lost it by default.  Apparently, uneducated communists never learned that because they were too busy molesting little children instead of attending debate society.

No two ways about it, Manifesto is the surliest bad influence that exists and he proved it repeatedly against himself.  Typical communist.

Per Frater Manifesto:

You didn't prove anything. Nor did you address any of my comments. All you did was stand on a soapbox with deaf ears, blindly preaching your ignorance and hatred.

It would appear that Manifesto is the ignorant one here: by resigning a formal written debate, he opened the matter to those who remain. Apparently he does not have a degree that a professional would respect, because no one with such a degree would commit such an embarrassing error.

Perhaps the greater matter is that of misfeasance. In abandonment of the debate, he claimed "victory," which of course is utterly ludicrous.

So is communism. I, for one of many, have seen what communism in any form always does. That is the most easily predicted fact in all of history: there is no more hateful atrocity than communism as history has already proven to exclusion.

Perhaps Frater Manifesto wants to make up the rules as he goes, the way Stalin did. Perhaps he wants to eliminate the opposition, the way the Khmer Rouge did. Perhaps he lusts after the power that Mao Zedong held. The common denominator, in every case, is sheer terror.

Perhaps Frater Manifesto would like to explain the reprehensible actions of the Chinese Communists in the Cultural Revolution. The United Nations estimates that sixty-five million people died in that surly bloodbath. That is by far the absolute kindest side of communism.

We have seen Manifesto's ilk before. We must see them again, as they seek out the ideals that they worship, and the formerly abstract and unsubstantiated concept of pure evil.

Manifesto, do you have an argument to rebut?

No?

Then let us find that the last nail that needed to be driven into the lid of the coffin of communism has been driven as of the humiliating defeat of communism in 1991.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Communism

Manifesto, the people you seek to talk to are at least one beer short of a six-pack, but that does not mean that you are not a pompous ass.

We have all sadly seen Manifesto's type before.  Predictable as the smog, these losers need the help of a government handout to survive.  That is why these failures were all written off to humiliating bitterness and irrecoverable discredit.

Communist agitators hope to have a free ride for life on the communist party, once it takes a people and a nation over.  That sort of treachery requires civil war.  People are killed, homes burned, and lives shattered.  Do they care if you are burned alive to aid and abet a hostile communist takeover?

Hell no!

All for what?  Iinvading communists don't place the "sleepers" in charge of the government or the people.  They execute sleepers, for being disloyal to their people: they would also be disloyal to the incoming communist government, once the truth comes out about how communist powers exploit people.

Hungary and Chechnya found that out the hard way.

So did 43 other nations that came under socialist tyranny.  When the Soviet Union collapsed from the weight of its sagging totalitarian empire, the whole world celebrated -- and justly so!

All, that is, but sulking old sellouts who didn't get their way.  They are still at it, as bitter and angry as ever before, always ready to offer half-truths and outright lies to brainwash gullible fools to take sides with them.

They failed hugely in 1991.  The world celebrated.  Let's keep the celebration of freedom going, if our lying bitter old communist tyrants still bitching in the background don't mind.

True enough, Strangelove.  Funny that you pick a name that reminds us all of the threat of nuclear holocaust we suffered as the Soviet Union and China repetitively violated the three-dozen international and UN treaties they signed, to reduce their nuclear stockpiles to an agreed-to level.

Maybe it served its purpose, though: your screen name reminds all with the sense to remember, that leftists of any sort are the most dangerous and disrespectful variety of scofflaws.

The hypocrisy and violence of the Soviet Union was nothing compared to the violence and hypocrisy of communist China. 

459,000 Chinese-Americans who escaped from the totalitarian regime of Mao Zedong would gladly attest.

So will 323,000 Russian immigrants, who hitch hiked across Russia and out through Norway and Sweden to escape the Soviet Union.

If I seem to be shooting holes in communism, rest assured that I am not.

History has already done the job for me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gulag_Archipelago