Originated from
QueryCAT

Worker's Compensation vrs Strick Liability lawsuit(s)

If an employer continues to engage in industrial activities that a.) Knows or should have known is hazardous to its employees (Toxic, Unvented Welding/Smelting fumes in a confined space) and b.) Continues to do same despite OHSA telling them to cease and decist said activities, CAN THE EMPLOYEES SUE UNDER THE THEORY OF STRICK LIABILITY OR ARE THEY PRECLUDED FROM DOING SO BY WORKER'S COMPENSATION?  My understanding is the Worker's Compensation is for normal, no fault industrial accidents---not injuries occuring as the result of criminal negligence. Your Opinion, Please.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

No answers were posted yet - be the first one to answer!

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for CPTG? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Define Government Company

Define Government Company
Submitted by goswami   1 year ago.
  • viewed 322 times
Last answer posted 1 year ago by Jerry3317


Q:

Absolut bottle profit

This one is for the bar owners. Whats the profit on one bottle of Absolut in an American bar?
Submitted by PamPam   2 years ago.
  • viewed 719 times
Last answer posted 1 year ago by RSantarelli99


Q:

How should a company account its public liability ...

How should a company account its public liability insurance?
Submitted by Lumi29   2 years ago.
  • viewed 222 times



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AOL Autos Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners