Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

A penny saved  is a penny earned

What's your opinion

US, UK, French heads demand Iran nuke site opened US, UK, French heads demand Iran nuke site opened
By BEN FELLER and GEORGE JAHN ,
AP


posted: 12 MINUTES AGO
comments: 3


PRINT|E-MAILMORE

Text SizeAAA

PITTSBURGH -Armed with the disclosure of a secret Iranian nuclear facility, President Barack Obama and the leaders of France and Britain demanded Friday that Tehran fully disclose its nuclear ambitions "or be held accountable" to an impatient world community.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Iran has until December to comply or face new sanctions. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown accused Iran of "serial deception."
Said Obama: "Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow."
Their dramatic joint statement opened the G-20 economic summit.
Obama urged the International Atomic Energy Agency to investigate the site.
Iran has kept the facility, 100 miles southwest of Tehran, hidden from weapons inspectors, but the U.S. has long known of its existence, a senior White House official told The Associated Press. Obama decided to go public with the revelation after Iran learned that Western intelligence agencies were aware of the project, the official said before the joint statement.
The officials spoke on grounds of anonymity so as not to pre-empt Obama.
Obama hopes the disclosure will increase pressure on the global community to impose new sanctions on Iran if it refuses to stop its nuclear program. Beyond sanctions, the leaders' options are limited and perilous; military action by the United States or an ally such as Israel could set off a dangerous chain of events in the Islamic world.
In addition, Iran's facilities are spread around the country and well hidden, making an effective military response difficult.
While the leaders did not mention military force, Sarkozy said, "Everything, everything must be put on the table now."
The disclosure comes on the heels of a U.N. General Assembly meeting at which Obama saw a glimmer of success in his push to rally the world against Iranian nuclear ambitions. And it comes days before Iran and six world powers are scheduled to discuss a range of issues including Tehran's nuclear program.
The U.S. has long avoided direct talks with Tehran over its nuclear program.
"The Iranian government must now demonstrate through deeds its peaceful intentions or be held accountable to international standards and international law," Obama said.
Sarkozy and Brown struck a more defiant tone than their U.S. counterpart.
"The level of deception by the Iranian government ... will shock and anger the whole international community, and it will harden our resolve," Brown declared, adding that it's time "to draw a line in the sand."
Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, made no mention of the facility this week while attending the U.N. General Assembly in New York, but said that his country had fully cooperated with international nuclear inspectors.
Also at the U.N. meeting, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev opened the door to backing potential new sanctions against Iran as a reward to Obama's decision to scale back a U.S. missile shield in Eastern Europe.
Iran is under three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment at what had been its single publicly known enrichment plant, which is being monitored by the IAEA.
Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the information was confidential, said that Iran's letter to the IAEA contained no details about the location of the second facility, when — or if — it had started operations or the type and number of centrifuges it was running.
But one of the officials, who had access to a review of Western intelligence on the issue, said it was about 100 miles southwest of Tehran and was the site of 3,000 centrifuges that could be operational by next year.
Iranian semiofficial new agency ISNA on Friday confirmed reports on the country's second enrichment plant.
Iranian officials had previously acknowledged having only the one plant, under IAEA monitoring, and had denied allegations of undeclared nuclear activities.
An August IAEA report said Iran had set up more than 8,000 centrifuges to produce enriched uranium at its underground facility outside the southern city of Natanz. The report said that only about 4,600 centrifuges were fully active.
Iran says it has the right to enrich uranium for a nationwide chain of nuclear reactors. But because enrichment can also produce weapons-grade uranium, the international community fears Tehran will make fissile material for nuclear warheads.
GOD BLESS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA & BLESS OUR TROOPS AND KEEP THEM SAFE.

GOD OUR FATHER,
 WALK THROUGH MY HOUSE
 AND TAKE AWAY ALL MY WORRIES AND ILLNESSES;
AND PLEASE WATCH OVER AND HEAL MY FAMILY
AND OUR TROOPS IN JESUS ' NAME..

 AMEN 
   NANADEE


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
76 helpful answers

I'm very skeptical of optimists and pessimists

Obama is the shepherd I did not want.
 He leadeth me beside the still factories.
 He restoreth my faith in the Republican party. (not much)
 He guideth me in the path of unemployment for his party's sake.
 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the bread line,
 I shall fear no hunger, for his bailouts are with me.
 He has anointed my income with taxes,
 My expenses runneth over.
 Surely, poverty and hard living will follow me all the days of my life,
 And I will live in a mortgaged home forever.......hey man.
 I am glad I am American, I can say this. Nothing is going to happen. Nothing will ever happen. Germany will rule the EU and America and Britain will be forced INEXONERABLY into second maybe even third rate powerless warmongers no one listens to because of our OWN weakness to face up to the fact that we are giving the country away.........way too willingly. It's happening as we speak. Russia and Germany are already making deals about energy. They DON"T NEED US anymore we are unreliable and the charlatan has put the icing on the cake of our self decline from prominence that started with Poppa Bush. 

Posted 2009-09-26T16:40:35Z
 
2 helpful answers

Iran is responsible for the protection of it's people. Why should it trust those countries who have stabbed it in the back in the past. Calling on Iran to surrender the type of nuclear material that we won't surrender is just hypocritical. Trying to starve them because we don't like what they're doing is asinine and illegal according to the geneva convention that we agreed to.

In a separate note, I'm really enjoying all those anti-Obama messages that I keep reading. It's just so so nice that all those neo-conservatives are suffering so deeply because they soo soo deserve it. Feeeeel the PAIN!

Posted 2009-10-07T06:49:01Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Nanadee? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Do you think it is wise to trust the government to ...

Do you think it is wise to trust the government to run GM, banks, health care, etc.... when they can't efficiently run anything ...
Submitted by Lisa   6 months ago.
  • viewed 3767 times
Last answer posted 10 days ago by max


Q:

Strategic political capital

What is exactly "strategic political capital"? Is there a text book answer or is this just another politician expresion?
Submitted by Charles P. T. Miller   2 months ago.
  • viewed 282 times
Last answer posted 1 day ago by Michael Johnson


Q:

Political Polls

These polls done daily - I have never been called in my life. I polled 50 other people verbally wiithin my age group, and they ...
Submitted by Mtngirl   7 months ago.
  • viewed 375 times
Last answer posted 17 days ago by Rocket112
Asked about "Obama AP Poll"



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics...

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Advise me please. Re: Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Entirely depends really... not that you should choose a course or uni based on purely that.Re: Is politics on its own

Hey Politics, I'm brand new to politics in general and want to learn. Where...

I have never wanted to get into politics before because I always felt that my say wouldn't count . Therefore, I want a good unbiased overview of whats happening. I know the basics of government and politics -made.Yeah, even as someone who didn't get into politics that much I could see that all the time

If one chooses to engage in politics, and I am as fascinated by it as anyone...

Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths. Makes sense. I'm a sociopath, now? Cool.What part of gummint do you work for?The voting constituency!Cheers. That leaves me out.
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License