What is Victory for this conflict "war" in Iraq, how are we going to decide when we have victory, and who is going to make that call? Should we achieve victory, when will our troops come back home or will they ever be allowed to return back home? And how can policing a state be justifiably called a war, when it isn't a war?
To say nothing, especially when speaking, is half the art of diplomacy.
You bring up some very good points. To answer you questions, there are never any winners when it comes to war.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings › My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
We can debate the logistics of the United States' conflict in the Middle East from now until the end of time. However, what I find extremely disappointing is how astonishingly little humankind has evolved as a species. The only thing that has advanced is our weapons technology and methods of killing one another. Unfortunately, our mentality has not progressed beyond that of Cain and Abel.
These six things doth the LORD hate: yes, seven are an abomination to him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood.
18 A heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that are swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and him that soweth discord among brethren.
The founding fathers advised neutrality because they knew world history. Foreign war is a great way to establish tyranny at home. YOU KNOW THAT DICTATORSHIP IN THE USA, a Hitler style national police state is being fastened upon us more day by day. the justification is terrorism.
www.whiteextinction.wordpress.com
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan, Belgium is more crowded than Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.Immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used against the white race.All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.Anti-white is called anti-racist, but it leads to the disappearance of one race and only one race. It is genocide.
Got an answer for Radical Ryushin? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them
