• Answers
  • Web
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:
Save
Cancel
AOL News

Top Headlines, U.S., World, Politics, Entertainment and Sports News -
AOL News

Spacecraft's Crash Into the Moon

In your view, was NASA's crash of a spacecraft into the moon a disappointment or a success?

NASA


Answer this question
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

5 Posted Answers
Order by

 
772 answers
174 helpful answers

Everything I say can be fully substantiated by my own opinion.

You know, when I was a kid in the 1960s, I was fascinated with space exploration.  I believe the space program has contributed greatly, in numerous ways, to the scientific world.

But, I think that the scientific community's obsession with finding water on the moon and on other planets is idle curiousity and does not justify the time and money being spent on it.  What good will it do us to know? 
Posted 2009-10-18T10:49:59Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
1746 answers
808 helpful answers

I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody.

I am much more in favor of spending our money on unmanned space exploration to the far reaches of the solar system, or a new space shuttle for scientific purposes. Going back to the moon should not be one of our priorities.

Posted 2009-10-18T11:16:17Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #3 out of 5
 
4 answers
1 helpful answer

Checking if there's water on the moon should be the job of hopeful developers that wish to build settlements on the moon (since they would be the ones concerned with this).

 

NASA should be focused on scientific exploration and not real-estate prospecting.
Posted 2009-10-18T13:14:01Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 

Thats how we did them all crahsed them nobody landed there, in the 1960 we would got lost in vietnam. They crash things but land there no
Posted 2009-11-05T05:37:04Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #4 out of 5
 
63 answers
12 helpful answers

There is no better guide through darkness then your own balance

Yes, the crash was science + engineering, a first step to have men on the moon instead in an unhealthy orbit. They have rocks, dust, water from the moon and x-ray's. To gain energy from water by dividing oxigen from hydrogen with the use of x-rays would solve the energy-problem. With rocks, dust, water they could build house's etc. To transport idea's is much cheaper. It is a first step, what would be done anyway.
Posted 2009-11-14T18:23:09Z
gunter was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(0)
Rated #5 out of 5

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for AOL News? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

The new moon missions

Will the new NASA mission to the moons will be only American or is there a cooperation with other nations ?
Submitted by swissknife   3 years ago.
  • 1 answer
  • viewed 538 times
Last answer posted 3 years ago by ali_d


Q:

Moon craters depth

What is the depth of the craters on the Moon ,that are visible from Earth?
Submitted by freder006   2 years ago.
  • 2 answers
  • viewed 968 times
Last answer posted 2 years ago by hemplover


Q:

A scifi NASA division

I remember I have seen in popular science an article about a NASA division that hires physicist that design ships with engines we ...
Submitted by majormajor   3 years ago.
  • 3 answers
  • viewed 561 times
Last answer posted 3 years ago by majormajor



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License