There is a definite positive payback now depending on your local electricity rates and the effective cost of financing a PV system.
In Calif we have available a time of use energy tariff from PG&E which charges more for electricity during peak usage hours when the least efficient generators are brought into production.
There is a surge of investment by financial institutions partnering with energy companies for funding School system power with PV
http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/milpitas-unified-school-district/rfid116092540
Electric power rates to the consumer are rising at 5 - 6%/year and a grid tied PV system will cost basically te loan charges and the occassional panel cleaning. Panels are guaranteed to deliver at least 80% of rated output after 20 years. Check out the E-1 standard tariff against the E-6 time of use tariff at PG&E or the equivalent at your local energy supplier.
http://www.pge.com/tariffs/ERS.SHTML#ERS
The daily Electricity consumption cycle can exceed a 2:1 Peak to baseline power ratio, so the peak correlated output from PV systems really helps power companies supply this cycle without overloading the distribution and generation system. In Northern Calif this cycle can be monitored in real time at
http://www.caiso.com/outlook/outlook.html
We recently installed a 3 KW PV system (with 22% efficiency panels) after refinancing at below 6% and we are currently recouping twice the system finance cost each month. We expect the payback to payoff the investment in about 8 years. After that our minimal PG&E bill will be without additional cost.
The main tradeoff is between system cost / watt and financing costs. If you have plenty of available area then less expenive PV panels can be used.
Checkout the magazine homepower at http://www.homepower.com/home/
and download the free trial issue.
Also check out PV suppliers such as Wind-sun.com at
http://www.wind-sun.com/
A great series of down-loadable talks (Videos with slides) is referenced at http://modular-e.com/education.htm