I'd rather be flying than trying to educate dumb a$$ Liberals

The Social Security Hoax

Is Social Security A Good Program.......Let me answer that for you.....NO...

In fact Social Security is the largest Ponzi Scheme ever devised by The Democrats to defraud hard working Americans out of their life savings.


Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)
Program.
He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary.
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400
of their annual incomes into the program,
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program
would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent 'Trust
Fund' rather than into the General Operating Fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no
other government program, and,
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as
income.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a
Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the federal government to put away, you may be interested in the following:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Which political party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it in to the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.
------------------------------------------------------------
Q. Which political party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
-----------------------------------------------------
Q. Which political party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the tie-breaking deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
--------------------------
Q: Which political party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
AND MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,they began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them even though they never paid a dime into it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is, uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.
But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to? Actions
speak louder than bumper stickers.
AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong
enough to take everything you have
----Thomas Jefferson----


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

17 Posted Answers
Order by

 
180 helpful answers

Open the pod bay doors HAL

If you're defining "Ponzi Scheme" as a program that pays out more than it takes in I agree with that. In years past wages were so low that SS witholding far exceeds the income it currently pays out. I'm not disagreeing with most of what you have written but here are a few pertinent facts of my own;

 My father-in-law entered the work force when he returned from WWII and over the next 45 years he paid in a total of (approx) 100,000.

He retired in 1990 and at 1,500 per month he's now drawn 342,000. He's 82 now and healthy as a horse. So for every year he lives add an additional 18,000 to his pile.

His brother passed away earlier this year at age 94 so if he (my father-in-law) lives another 12 years, that's 30 years at 18,000 per year or 540,000 total.

Tony, you don't have to be a math whiz or an economics major to understand that the SS fund needs to be beefed up and some of the items you've mentioned have been done to accomplish that. So the answer to this whole "Ponzi Scheme" is to tax the current work force at the rate at which they are expected to draw it out when they retire. I seriously doubt it!

As far as the general fund is concerned, so what. The day the US government defaults on SS because there's no money to pay will be the last day this democracy exists in the form it is now.

When you were reciting your "Roosevelt facts" you left out one very important item; SS was never intended to be retirement income, it was intended as a supplement to retirees. Folks who weren't around in 1936 don't understand this and complain that SS benefits should be higher. There is no way SS won't continue to exist without increased contributions and taxes and those are just the facts.

Posted 2009-08-05T10:50:07Z
 
6 helpful answers

I'd rather be flying than trying to educate dumb a$$ Liberals

Most of the people you are referring to only paid the 1% into the system in the early days of its establishment...If your father-in-law had just put that money into regular treasury bonds at 5% with compound interest over 50 years,he would have a million or more to his name...The biggest part of the fraud is that you have absolutely no equity..If your father-in-law died at age 64 and had no spouse,the government gets to keep his life savings...Even the people who work for The Social Security Administartion don't want it and don't pay into it...I can't imagine why you would defend a fraud...Most Liberals(I don't know if you are one)think the same way you do...None of the Government workers pay Social Security..They have their own private retirement accounts and YES THEY HAVE EQUITY in theirs...So show me where SS is so great?????I am a small business man and I have to pay 15.2% into my SS and I will net only 1,700.00 a month when I retire....After paying for over 50 years as well,I could have retired a millionaire by investing the money the same way I suggested for your father-in-law...Of course your father-in-law should love SS for he paid the least into it....I would be interested in your response...Do you work for the government????

Posted 2009-08-05T12:35:43Z
 
180 helpful answers

Open the pod bay doors HAL

You got your wish, point by point;

"Most of the people you are referring to only paid the 1% into the system" exactly and with the annual COL SS is running a deficit and requires additional funding.

"If your father-in-law had just put that money into regular treasury bonds at 5%" he was a WWII vet from Tennesee and had a family to support, not to mention the fact that he didn't have the benefit of your 50 year 20-20 hindsight.

"The biggest part of the fraud is that you have absolutely no equity" are you defining fraud as cheating, trickery or a deliberate decption to secure unlawful gain? I understand you don't like or agree with the system but that's a little hysterical don't you think!

"..If your father-in-law died at age 64 the government gets to keep his life savings" that's correct but you are the only person I've ever heard refer to SS witholding as "life savings".

"...Even the people who work for The Social Security Administartion don't want it and don't pay into it" most pay into FERS which has theee parts, one of which is SSI.

"...I can't imagine why you would defend a fraud" calling SSI a fraud is ... well, you know.

"...Most Liberals(I don't know if you are one)think the same way you do" I'm registered Republican, consider myself moderate and don't pretend to know how "most liberals" think...

"None of the Government workers pay Social Security" government employees pay into FERS..they have their own private retirement accounts and YES THEY HAVE EQUITY in theirs;" I agree that two parts of FERS have equity but with the stock market in decline over the past few years some don't have a lot to show for it while those on SSI are unaffected by this.

"...So show me where SS is so great?????" Just try not sending SSI checks next month and I'll show you how great the consequences are. Some people actually need the money and feel they are entitled to it.

"I am a small business man and I have to pay 15.2% into "my SS and I will net only 1,700.00 a month when I retire...After paying for over 50 years as well,I could have retired a millionaire by investing the money the same way I suggested for your father-in-law" are you telling me that with your 50 year hindsight advantage on the old guy you're not doing what you're suggesting he could have/should have done??????????

"...Of course your father-in-law should love SS for he paid the least into it" you're short sighted, when he was making 2,500 a year, he was also buying a house, a car, food, insurance, clothes and raising 2 kids. That small percentage, which is nothing to you, was big bucks to him. Damn right, he struggled to pay into it, and feels as if he's entitled to what he draws out.

".....I would be interested in your response" OK, hope I didn't disappoint you....

"Do you work for the government????" from 1989 thru 1999.

Posted 2009-08-06T03:26:59Z
 
6 helpful answers

I'd rather be flying than trying to educate dumb a$$ Liberals

Well I figured you worked for the government....

I will take your points one at a time...Lets start with this one...

The biggest part of the fraud is that you have absolutely no equity" are you defining fraud as cheating, trickery or a deliberate decption to secure unlawful gain? I understand you don't like or agree with the system but that's a little hysterical don't you think!.....

Yes I define FRAUD as thievery when the Congress of the United States writes legislation allowing them to steal my SS money and yet no one ever dips into the governments retirement money....Why do you government people think you have the right to steal my money ,yet yours is off limits...The next time you get an urge to build a road or bridge in West Virginia,take the money out of The Congressional Retirement Fund,especially Robert (KKK) Byrds who thinks that he personally manages the SS system.

If I want to work after I am 66,which is now the age I am qualified for full benefits,yet the legal aliens who never paid a dime into the system are qualified at 65 to collect not only SS but also receive subsidized housing,food stamps,free medical,etc etc...I don't qualify for subsidized anything...Doesn't pay to be a WHITE HARD WORKING AMERICAN in this country...We will change that crap  starting in 2010....Getting back to working after I start to collect SS at 66,why should I be double taxed if I want to continue working..I am limited to what I can earn after I am 66..That is fraud as well.

I will take all your other points one at a time...

Just another Obama government hack who won't answer the tough questions....Happily he's only going to be a one term President while many of the slugs that are in the Democratic party won't get through the 2010 elections...It won't get here soon enough for me. Please go back and tell Obama the Kenyan you heard something fishy.

Posted 2009-08-06T12:31:49Z
 
17 helpful answers

Tom'bing

We all have a right to our own opinion. All of us are never right, nor ever wrong. it's the same old song, if one is a young Tarzan/Soldier, one can become disabled in combat in a few seconds, quartered in war. if a Veteran returns home with an angel on his shoulder, no shoes, one leg, no legs, one arm, no arms. little, or  no minds! Fanklin D. Roosevelt, President in a Wheel/Chair, came to their aid with SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE, AND GODS HELP. IT ISN'T A SOCIALIST COUNTRY TO HELP IT'S DISABLED, SICK AND AGED TAX/PAYERS AFTER THE BATTLES ARE WON. IT'S CALLED HUMAN, HUMANITY, CARING FOR OTHERS, REWARDING OURSELVES FOR BEING HUMAN> THIS OLD DISABLED VETERAN IS CONCERNED TOO, WHEN OTHERS FEATHER THEIR OWN NESTS, AND USE OUR FEATHERS! -- BING/BANG.

Posted 2009-08-08T05:06:13Z
 
6 helpful answers

I'd rather be flying than trying to educate dumb a$$ Liberals

Fanklin D. Roosevelt, President in a Wheel/Chair, came to their aid with SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE, AND GODS HELP. IT ISN'T A SOCIALIST COUNTRY TO HELP IT'S DISABLED, SICK AND AGED TAX/PAYERS AFTER THE BATTLES ARE WON. IT'S CALLED HUMAN, HUMANITY, CARING FOR OTHERS, REWARDING OURSELVES FOR BEING HUMAN> THIS OLD DISABLED VETERAN IS CONCERNED TOO, WHEN OTHERS FEATHER THEIR OWN NESTS, AND USE OUR FEATHERS! -- BING/BANG..................

Just like the Government Hack you avoided answering my questions...To use your own words,you just feathered your own nest,using MY FEATHERS...Tell me why Legal Aliens just turning 65 who never paid a dime into SS qualify for it in the first place,while I now have to wait until I am 66 with reduced benefits and I have paid into the system over 50 years....Recently the Congress with the help of Nazi Pelosi are going to also give SS to ILLEGAL ALIENS.....Why should the Congress help themselves to my FEATHERS while they hide their FEATHERS in private retirement accounts every time they want to fund one of their pork barrel egregious projects..

Your reasons for SS are rediculous when there are many other ways to help the veterans without robbing Americans of their life long contributions to SS......A seperate fund just targeted for helping veterans should come out of the general fund and it could easily be funded just by stopping the rediculous amounts of money going to foreign countries...Americans first and foreigeners 2nd or not at all if it means shorting our veterans.

Debating you about SS is like Mohammed Ali fighing a one armed boy scout...No contest,no sensible rebuttal so far.

Posted 2009-08-08T13:27:41Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #10 out of 17
 
180 helpful answers

Open the pod bay doors HAL

You're not in any contest man because in order to have a contest there has to be 2 people open minded enough to discuss an issue and see each others point. You have progressed from calling SS a "Ponzi scheme and fraud to complaining about Pelosi, foreign aid and illeagle ailens and in every future post you'll expand your list until you've covered everything. It's obvious that you are a chronoic complainer so dissatisfied with every aspect of American life (and I'm not saying it's perfect) that nothing will satisfy you.

No matter how much money you put into SS you'll draw 1,700 for life after retirement. If you live until 66 or 100 and that's not bad in the estimation of most people. I'm not saying it couldn't be improved but in the process you'd throw the baby out with the bath water.

If I were king for a day I would refund every penny you paid into SS, and exempt you and from receipt of any benefits and tell you to have at it. Go invest any amount you want in those bonds and retire when you please. I'm sure you'll have sufficient funds to carry you thru and also take care of your wife, in the event of your untimely demise. How's that work for you.   

Posted 2009-08-08T14:49:34Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #11 out of 17
 
6 helpful answers

I'd rather be flying than trying to educate dumb a$$ Liberals

If I were king for a day I would refund every penny you paid into SS, and exempt you and from receipt of any benefits and tell you to have at it. Go invest any amount you want in those bonds and retire when you please. I'm sure you'll have sufficient funds to carry you thru and also take care of your wife, in the event of your untimely demise. How's that work for you...................................

If you have that kinda clout....Do it,don't just talk about....I'll take all my money with 5% interest compounded for 50 years and live happily ever after....You and Nancy Pelosi can both stick it.You Libs know your going to get your a$$e$ kicked in 2010.Better get your ride in Nancys' new G5 now before it's too late.

Your the one with the closed mind..You just think everything that the Democrats want to do should be followed like a bunch of Zombies with no opposition or any other point of view...........

If you like Communism so much,why don't you move to Russia,and take Obama and all the Democrats with you.  

Posted 2009-08-08T20:56:23Z
Helpful?(0)
Rated #12 out of 17

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Tony? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

What access does social security have with my ...DIRECT DEPOSIT BANK ACCOUNT?

What access does social security have with my access accounts?
Submitted by geno   11 months ago.
  • viewed 786 times
Last answer posted 11 months ago by Colo Bob


Q:

Social Security is about to give an estimate as to ...

Social Security is about to give an estimate as to when its funds will run out. Since those paying into Social Security are fewer ...
Submitted by Rosie   2 years ago.
  • viewed 390 times
Last answer posted 6 months ago by Tony


Q:

Why do I get less for social security than an ...

why do I get less for social security than an illegal alien gets
Submitted by Rose   1 year ago.
  • viewed 79 times



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Why does McCain get Social Security?

Comment: Is this true? Does John McCain collect Social Security? Why? http://podcastpatriot.com /2008/07/18...cial-security/ IMHO, it is probably true. Social Security is age based. I do know the benefit is reduced

US Government Social Security Office Complaint Complaint - Social Security...

I recently had the pleasure of trying to replace my lost Social Security card. What a joy visiting of my coveted Social Security number. We have been raised since birth here in the US to guard the SS on their SSNs. Income, social security, and Medicare taxes are withheld from the earnings of the illegals

Your Social Security Number is NOT to be Used for Identification

Your Social Security Number is NOT to be Used for Identification http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ssn.htm For those not old enough to remember what was on a Social Security Card, here is proof. AFAIK The Law Originally Posted by boyntonstu Your Social Security Number is NOT to be Used for Identification
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License