Well then why aren't you breaking down the White House doors to retrieve all the WELFARE money doled out for the bailouts?Those BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars could go a looooooooooooooooooong way towards helping people on fixed incomes.
Isn't section 8 hardship? Sounds alot like AIG and Chrysler. You would begrudge a person on SS, with VERY limited funds the right to own an animal because they can't afford the fee charged by the rental company? I'm sorry but I feel everything in this day and age should be based on your income level. Especially when it comes to seniors living on SS.
For some older citizens those animals are the only thing they have, and it's a proven fact that people with pets not only are happier, but healthier and live longer.
I definitely think if the govt. can subsidize the rich, they can subsidize the poor and the elderly. I think the pet fee should be substancially reduced or waived altogether for people living below the poverty level, provided they are American CITIZENS that is.
If my tax dollars can go to bailout the big corps. I'd much rather the money was given to someone who really needed it, then some ass of a CEO who took a MILLION dollars of GOVT. WELFARE money to redecorate his already LAVISH office. Or the rest of them that took LAVISH vacations and used the rest of the money for upkeep on their many LAVISH mansions!!!
And You complain about a FEW hundred dollars???????????????????