5 thumbs up
'Maybe some women aren't meant to be tamed. Maybe they need to run free until they find someone just as wild to run with"

Love?

When thinking of love, which is better, the kind of love that is passionate but short lived, or a love that is prolonged and full of history?


Would you like to answer or comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

Order by
 
All that you want to know about love and romance. http://www.valentinesday4all.blogspot.com

Well i guess this depends on people...some would say that short lived love is the ideal and there would be many who would differ from this view...well some more views and ideas on love you can visit this

site and check out all the stuff that's there on love!!!

Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#17 out of 20
3
2

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
18 thumbs up

Trust no one and Respect is earned not given!!!!

The answer to your love question lies inside of u. Do u want the high,exsitment,the buterfly feeling u get every time u think u are in love or do u want that deep understanding unconditenal love of a mate, the one who loves u for u and for who u are? Becouse if u know it or not u are the one who controls your destany. Take a moment and close your eyes and see if u can see what lies in your heart!  Good Luck


Posted 1 year ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#2 out of 20
0
4

Helpful?

line
line
line



 

Be who you want to be, Not what others want to see.

Well both are better. IF they are short lived but very passionate then ya kno...its good because there was love between that short lived one. But if its long and full of history, its even better because you and that person lasted way longer. so probably long and full of history because the feelings yall 2 had was long and those feelings didnt stop.


Posted 1 year ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#9 out of 20
0
1

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
469 thumbs up

You are talking about two stages of love; the first, passionate is in youth and is often short-lived. The real deep love comes later on in life when you and your mate have gone through happy and difficult moments and recognize the qualities each of you has and how they were employed in daily life. I think the second stage is really the most beautiful.


Posted 1 year ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#6 out of 20
2
4

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
6 thumbs up

     The first kind of love you mention, the one that is short lived and exciting and your partner can't do anything wrong, is not really love at all, but only lust and partial love. You're only fully in love w/ someone when the two of you have seen both the good and bad of each other and been through many different experiences together over a prolonged period of time and are still committed to one another. This is true love and there's nothing better. When the two of you have been together for many years and still enjoy each other's company and are sincerely happy and have no regrets, then you know that it's love.  :)


Posted 1 year ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#3 out of 20
0
4

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
2 thumbs up

I think that a long lasting relationship full of history and love is a lot better. To love someone is to know them and from experience it can take years to really "know" your signifigant other.  There are unconscious steps that people go through to have meaningful relationships.  If you don't go through all those steps you can pretty much refer to that relationship as "a nice way to kill time".  I think people can have good whirl wind relationships but unfortunately they don't usually last. The whirl whind relationship usually ends in a friendship or the people act like they never even knew eachother at all.


Posted 1 year ago ( permalink )
In reply to Yherrera's question
Rated as
#4 out of 20
0
4

Helpful?