Jackson pollock

I know that some of you may think I'm an idiot, but I'll ask anyway: why is Jackson Pollock regarded as an important artist?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

Order by
 
719 thumbs up

I was late for work this morning, because I got stuck in Zeno's paradox

Jackson Pollock  is considered an important artist because he was the first to paint in a particular style called Abstract Expressionism, that became popular in the 1950's.

I personally do not like his style of painting, but that  is very subjective


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
#3 out of 7
0
1

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
Sya
36 thumbs up

The free exchange of information will revolutionalize the world! 

www.shedreamsindigital.net

The main reason Jackson Pollock is an important artist is because of the controversy over his style of painting.  Some critics felt that it lacked any skill or thought and therefore unworthy of praise.  Yet others felt his work was the epitome of aesthetic value.

Some of Pollock's exhibitions had been secretly sponsored by the CIA.  In 1949 he was profiled in Life Magazine as possibly 'the greatest living American artist' and in 1956, Time magazine nicknamed him "Jack the Dripper".  Cute, huh?


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
Best Answer
0
2

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
18 thumbs up

I wouldn't worry about being thought an idiot - the answer isn't necessarily obvious.  I think a lot of it is about being the right person in the right place at the right time. Pollock was an American artist, aware of European surrealism, which  felt that the conscious mind shouldn't or, indeed couldn't, be in control of creative decisions, who came to public attention at a time when it was important for America to be seen to be carrying the torch of freedom of expression as opposed to the repression that was happening in Russia and the Eastern bloc. Someone who spattered paint freely across a canvas as Pollock did - well, there's your ideal free spirit, right there. At the same time, there were serious currents of thought favouring the significance of chance in creative expression, inspired by sources from contemporary advances in physics, and their supposed analogues in for example Zen Buddhism that also underlay what Pollock and his contemporaries were doing. 


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
Best Answer
0
2

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
339 thumbs up

Excellent answers, I learned a lot of new things here.

I don't know much about art, and I was never very impressed with Pollocks work, until I saw one of his works in real life -- it was amaing. It was huge and it looked as if it was moving all the time. Brilliant. 


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
#5 out of 7
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
812 thumbs up

Jackson Pollock put the New York school of painting on the map so that New York replaced Paris as the center of modern art. It seems to the viewer that he randomly threw and dripped paint onto his canvas but that is incorrect. There are films showing how he worked by deliberately chosing color and brush to drip the paint where he wanted it to drip; so none of his paintings were done by chance.


Posted 2 years ago ( permalink )
Rated as
#4 out of 7
0
1

Helpful?

line
line
line



 

What were free form jazz, free form dance, and free form painting?  All these expressions require some understanding of the medium they are working in certainly, but the improvisational jazz musician and dancer move away from structured scales and keys or choreography.  Pollock's type of pure expression painting, rather than realist illustration, became important after realism had seemed to have been completely explored and exploited.  

 

While Jackson Pollock was deliberate in his work, Pollock's paintings were not thought out.  Instead, they were done in a pure sense of "now".  He made no preliminary sketches nor worked out the design in advance, yet each of his paintings was unique.  He discovered the key to full blown abstract expressionism by not allowing realism to influence his painting.  If you are a painter or artist you may understand just how hard this is to do.  Think about this: as an artist you are drawing, sculpting or painting something, even if it's a vision only you can see in your mind you are creating something that already exists somewhere.  Pollock tried to transcend this basic instinct of the artist to create succinct images. Instead he created in a purely abstract way. 

 

Pollock's paintings had rhythm, and movement.  And they are simply interesting to view and experience, particularly when viewing the actual painting, not a reproduction of it.  Many, though not all, art consignors like to view his work.  Yes, anyone could create a Pollock looking painting, but are they really creating in the same way as Pollock?  Even the most abstract of your child's painting is trying to depict something.  Is it the way she sees a tree or how her cat looks to her, or even some fantastic imaginary place in her mind?  These drawings or paintings may be beautiful and interesting in their own right, but they are probably different in approach than what Pollock was attempting to do.  Sometimes his painting, as he said, "didn't work", and this was probably when he over thought, or realized exactly what he was doing. 

 

I believe he indeed found a way to record his meditations.  Consider this: Buddhist meditate by focusing on some one thing, until their minds are emptied, and they are not mindful of anything, thus putting themselves in a state where time and space are not recognized.  This is how Jackson Pollock taught himself to meditate, through painting.  Many painters talk about how God guides their hand and they find themselves in a zone as they create, where time flies by, or even seems not to exist.  I would suggest they are in a deep state of meditation, and Pollock painted in this way as well.  Pollock’s break through was that instead of creating a picture while in that state he rather recorded the event itself, and many art critics, and layman alike, realized the result was beautiful, fascinating, intriguing and worthy.         
                    

Posted 9 months ago ( permalink )