• Answers
  • Web
tom

DSLR question

Finally convinced myself to get into the DSLR scene and leave behind my point&shoot


Decided on the 350d, there is a bundle at the moment [camera 2 lenses (18-55 &55-200) + bat pack]. Question being would it be better to buy body only and then get a half decent lense, Canon EF 28-200 USM? Something that takes in the whole range.


Any help would be appreciated.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 

Best Answer

 
49 helpful answers

Well, choosing the right lens is something that can be done only after you get an idea of what kind of photography you might be interested in. 

Bear in mind the thumb rule saying that the shorter the lens range is, the better the quality, meaning you'll get better results from a 2 lens combo than with a single lens covering the whole range, especially at the extremes, which tend to produce a bit distorted images.

However, you won't want to switch lenses all the time, so you'll need a good walk around that'll cover the ranges you'll mostly use. I agree that the kit lens (18-55) isn't much of a deal, however it produced some nice shots for me. A good alternative is the Canon 17-85 IS USM which gives you a nice range and good results on the wide end, but a not satisfactory min f number of 4.0 (although the IS mechanism compensates a bit at low light situations). A chepaer and also nice one is the Sigma 17-70. It's a really nice starting walk around, that has a Macro-like feature, and also a great 2.8f number, for low light shooting.

Combine one of those with a nice tele to give some good zooming when needed (you can get the mediocre canon 75-300 USM for a good price just for the start) and see where it leads you.

I'd also go for a Canon 50mm f1.8. A very useful lens for about 70$.

An extra battery pack is a must. I'm doing fine without a grip, but those who have it say they can't live without it, and there are half priced Opteka grips for the 350d, manufactured in the same factory, just without the canon logo.

For further lens recommendations, you better do some reading. A nice place to start looking at models and seeing some examples is here: http://photodoto.com/lens/.

You also have the canon slr lens forum at dpreview here: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1029

And some flickr 350d users groups with many discussions on lenses here: Canon Digital Rebel XT 350D XT users and Canon 300D&350D.

Posted 2006-08-01T10:15:40Z
Helpful?(8)
Rated as Best Answer

 

All Answers
Order by

 
22 helpful answers

It really depends. Keep in mind that with the 28-200 you lose 10mm (well, 15 or 16mm in 35mm terms) on the wide end. However, you *do* get a much better lens, and you only have to carry around one lens to get the full range. I guess the question is, will you notice the difference of losing out on the wide angle? What would it cost you to get the body + 28-200 lens?

Posted 2006-07-31T15:43:04Z
 
17 helpful answers

I would definitely recommend getting the body only and putting the difference towards a lens. I didnt but i should have. The kit lens with the 350 (18-55mm) is useless. I'm not too sure about the other lens. How much is the combo deal? I think the battery grip is at least 100+ so if you were saving money then it might be worth it..

Posted 2006-07-31T16:22:32Z
 
13 helpful answers
Check out the Travel Blogs

I don't know about canon specifically. I switched to DSLR in the Nikon universe. I had the same thought - use the Sigma lens I had and start shooting with the DSLR.

 

What I found out was:

- The effective lens range changed from 28-200 to 42-300 (x1.5 factor. It's a little different for canon) so I couldn't really shoot wide angle.

- The lens didn't _quite_ work well. Focus sometimes has issues. I sometimes had to focus twice, etc.

 - Had I had real nikon lens it might have been ok, but I'll never know.

 

So - not canon, but I'd say buy the canon-specific digital lens if it exists. 

Posted 2006-08-01T16:40:39Z
EranD was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

 

I would definitely not go for the 28-200, simply because it's not a wide-angle lens (as mentioned, it's effectively 42mm after the x1.5 conversion). I personally use a 18-200 Nikkor lens (I'm a Nikon user), which covers a very wide range and is very practical. However, it's bulky and heavy and it has a minimum aperture of f3.5, which means it can only be used when there is a lot of light. Use it inside a not-very-lit room and you'll have to use flash (even with ISO 1600). I also bought a 50mm f1.8 lens, which is very limited (you have to zoom-in with your legs), but is wonderful in low light situations. It also produces incredibly sharp photos with beautiful depth of field (such as this one). I find myself switching between these two lenses quite often, even though I hate switching lenses. :)

Good luck!

Posted 2007-12-12T11:32:23Z
 

for some people, its best for them to buy the body only and buy a separate lens. This is only if you have enough money to spend. But if you are in a tight budget. Getting the kit lens is always a good idea. When i was on assignment and i was tasked to shoot this really old refinery, i was trying to focus on some old gate valves and trusses..its kinda far from me and i just realized i should have a longer lens.

Posted 2009-10-30T06:50:07Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for tom? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Buying a DSLR- New D80 or used D200 ?

I left film photography a while ago, after getting a compact P&S digital camera. I really missed shooting with an SLR, but they ...
Submitted by zipi   2 years ago.
  • viewed 822 times
Last answer posted 3 months ago by mugenalonso


Q:

Looking to buy a DSLR camera bag

I'm looking to buy a protective bag for my new DSLR camera - a Nikon D80. I currently have only one lens, but I plan on buying ...
Submitted by Eran   2 years ago.
  • viewed 2426 times
Last answer posted 2 months ago by mugenalonso


Q:

DSLR - Canon 400D or Nikon D80?

DSLR - Canon 400D or Nikon D80?
Submitted by sandeepsk   2 years ago.
  • viewed 659 times
Last answer posted 3 months ago by mugenalonso



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License