When figting the wildfires in California, why are they using only DC=Super Tanker rather than the 747 that carries twice as much? Why not use the carrier that can put an end to the fire more quickly?
The first step can take you anywhere!
I would imagine it has something to do with the weight of the water, i don't know the answer for sure but i would imagine a 747 full of water is bloody heavy, i know it's a big plane. Then when it's half full...i'm talking about the way the water moves about on the plane, balast yeah. This is not an answer, just an opinion. I will watch and see.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
Got an answer for mushi521? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them