"THIS WAS IN MY E-MAIL,FROM ONE OF OUR BEST POSTERS"
"PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ, THANK YOU"
Good Morning Friends,
I take this recent statement by Dr. Charles Krathammer not as fact, but as a distinct possibility.
I am not sure how many of you are familiar with the Climate Change Meeting that will be occurring in December, (Copenhagen), and the potential ramifications on Americas Sovereignty? At this point I don't, but am trying to educate myself as to the possible outcomes. Why? Because it is really starting to assail my basic American sensibility. Sorry, but I kind of like what freedoms we still posses, and have this unnerving feeling that what this administration is trying to do with OUR country is simple. That is to Take us into economic parity with the rest of the developed nations. Instead of being number ONE, we shall be ONE of many.
Dr. Krathammers statement, or belief.
"Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the United States, but more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate & coordinate various countries and their
agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the first President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!"
With that thought in mind I have taken several sections of the proposed Global Climate Change Treaty and did a little cutting and pasting.
What you will notice is what I call a lot of multiple choice language. Depending on the choices taken, and the signatures adhered to, will basically determine what we as a once sovereign nation will contribute to the rest of the world. From what I can tell, if the proper wording is picked in the FILL IN THE BLANKS, we will be screwed. You be the judge.
Here are some of the excerpts. Once again you be the judge.
When I filled in the most conservative blanks, guess what? Take the first paragraph and you fill in the blank and ask yourself, WHAT DOES THIS DO TO OUR ECONOMY? OUR JOBS? OUR WAY OF LIFE???
If you recall Bush would not sign the Kyoto Treaty that called for a 5% reduction of Carbon Emissions for the vast ramifications that would be felt by the U. S. Let me think. What do you thing a 75 % reduction would do, much less a 95% reduction.
[And [in the range of 75–85] [by at least 85] [by at least 90] [by more than 95] per cent
by 2050.]]
Alternative to subparagraph 31 (b):
[should transform their economies over the coming decades in order to collectively reduce their
greenhouse gas emissions by 80–95per cent by 2050 compared to 1990 levels.]
36. The new agreed post-2012 institutional arrangement and legal framework to be established for
the implementation, monitoring, reporting and verification of the global cooperative action for
mitigation, adaptation, technology and financing, should be set under the Convention. It should include a
financial mechanism and a facilitative mechanism drawn up to facilitate the design, adoption and
carrying out of public policies, as the prevailing instrument, to which the market rules and related
dynamics should be subordinate, in order to assure the full, effective and sustained implementation of the
Convention.
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three
basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization
of which will include the following:
(a)
The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on
adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds
and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will
operate as such, as appropriate.
[[[Be legally binding, and] [Include] [legally-binding] provisions for ensuring the
compliance of Annex II Parties with their financial commitments to support enhanced
action on adaptation in developing countries] [Provisions for ensuring the compliance of
developed country Parties with their financial and technology transfer commitments shall
be legally binding];]
2. [National adaptation plans [are to be] [should be] [reviewed and] updated [every [three to] four
years] [with financial support from the Convention Adaptation Fund]. [Implementation of] national
[adaptation plans [and actions]] [adaptation planning processes] [should be ongoing and iterative, and
activities] [should be] [could be] [reported] [included] as part of a country’s national communication.]
23. [[To promote [[the] enabling [activities] [environments] [(policy, legislative and institutional)] to
support] [, enable and support the implementation of] adaptation action[s], [all Parties] [Parties] [all
FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.2
Page 35
developing country Parties [particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with low-
lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and
developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems]] [with financial support from the Convention
Adaptation Fund, technical support and capacity-building] [shall][should][may]:] [To promote the
enabling activities to enhance adaptation actions in all developing country Parties, the developed country
Parties should]:
At this point there are 200 pages of this piece of work.
Does the Carbon Issue need to be addressed? Yes. Does Health Care need to be addressed. Yes.
How? In small, systematic increments that actually accomplish the ends to the mean. That don't disrupt our whole social and economic system at the insistence of our Presidents outlook on our FLAWED and unfair nation.
The question that I need to ask is very simple. Is this GCC treaty a means to Obama's true goal as suggested by Dr. Krathammer? How does this tie into Cap and Trade, Health Care, Compensation Control, Education, and all of the other radical changes that he is trying to enact?
I think that we are starting to see the larger picture now.
KEEP THE FAITH, and I think it is safe to say, KEEP UP THE FIGHT!
B.
