Should Bush be tried for war crimes?

Hi dogbreeder,

Yes he did commit war crimes. What do you call innocent children, women and men dying because of one nation greed for oil. One doesn't need to go to University to read between the lines and understand the fact that the Iraqi war is about oil and America having control over it. Ask General Powell why he resigned from the Bush administration. If indeed the war was about weapons of mass destruction then Saddam should not have been the only dictator to be overthrown, what about the government in Iran, what about China developing nuclear technology, what about north Korea? It made more economic sense for Bush to start a war in Iraq because of oil. So when you deeply analyse the issue Bush is no different from Stalin and Hitler who used other to commit mass murders and justified it, or from Characters like Idi Amin and Paul Kagame who killed many in their countriies in the pretex of protecting them from this or that dictator. Bush is responsible for the killing of many Iraqis and many more are still dying this very minute because of bombs and guns, the question still stands should he go scot free or should he stand trial? Is he more human than other Presidents who have murdered people and believed at the time they were doing it it was in the interest of the people?

Hi dogbreeder,

Yes he did commit war crimes. What do you call innocent children, women and men dying because of one nation greed for oil. One doesn't need to go to University to read between the lines and understand the fact that the Iraqi war is about oil and America having control over it. Ask General Powell why he resigned from the Bush administration. If indeed the war was about weapons of mass destruction then Saddam should not have been the only dictator to be overthrown, what about the government in Iran, what about China developing nuclear technology, what about north Korea? It made more economic sense for Bush to start a war in Iraq because of oil. So when you deeply analyse the issue Bush is no different from Stalin and Hitler who used other to commit mass murders and justified it, or from Characters like Idi Amin and Paul Kagame who killed many in their countriies in the pretex of protecting them from this or that dictator. Bush is responsible for the killing of many Iraqis and many more are still dying this very minute because of bombs and guns, the question still stands should he go scot free or should he stand trial? Is he more human than other Presidents who have murdered people and believed at the time they were doing it it was in the interest of the people?