Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton?

Infact that's the most important question, the American people might be slowly developing a pattern where they vote for family names rather than quality and ability, take George .W. Bush for example he's never been the best of candidates and one can't argue much with the idea that him coming from the Bush family helped him defeat a much better Al Gore, Gore was on many counts much better than Bush but in the final analysis the Bush name prevailed. We need to be careful or we risk creating a defacto Monarchy.

If Chelsea stood and ruled for 8 years the total would actually come to 44 years not 48 years since George Bush senior only ruled for 1 term. 

I also agree with OronD. But what about George .W. Bush is that the best America could do, look at what he has done to the country (i.e the economy, the foreign image etc). It is quite clear that if he had not come from the Bush family he would have come no where near the American Presidency. Yet he ascended to power and now look at what he has done to America. It is true that if the Bush-Clinton families will continue producing the best candidates for Presidency then let them rule for 100 years and create a defacto monarchy, but let them not give us the calibre of George .W. Bush.