• Answers
  • Web
Answer 15 out of 36
 
1 helpful answer
A:

Agreed, except when we, the tax payers, are having to fork out to satisfy an artist's indulgence. Was it right that we had to subsidise one exhibition where a light turned on and off in an empty room at various intervals? No-one is going to persuade me that this was not simply taking the p*** - at our expense! 

Helpful?(0)
Rated #19 out of 36
 
Comment About This Answer (or add your own answer)

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2010, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners