Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

In Art is everything acceptable?

 I saw this weird play last week with lots of nudity and cursing. I didn't really understand the bottom line of the play but I don't consider myself a culture critic. Do you think that in art everything is acceptable?  Are there any borders/red lines we as a society should have while making art?


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

33 Posted Answers
Order by

 
67 helpful answers
Your own personal jesus

What borders do we have today?We kill for many reasons, we molest and abuse for ideas that many times are as abstract as our art, we are borderless – therefore art is borderless. Isn’t war a form of art? What about a person who view himself as an artist and in the process murders or rapes? So there are no borders but there may be “destinations” we will chose never to traverse, if you find a form of art offending do not support it.

Posted 2007-10-26T17:43:10Z
Helpful?(3)
Rated as Best Answer
 
1 helpful answer

pretty much anything is acceptable as art as long as it has a point or a message you are trying to emitt

Tongue out

Posted 2007-10-27T22:04:09Z
 
47 helpful answers

This is a very good question regarding all of the arts. Is a toilet bowl in the middle of a room, with rocks around it art? (just something I came up with...). On the one hand there is a notion in the artistic world that we must continue to reinvent ourselves and therefore artists are expected to try and come up with new things that no one has ever seen before. On the other hand one must ask himself: "Is there a limit?". There is no clear answer but the one sure thing is that art is completely subjective, and hence, today, practically anything can be considered art. All we can do is give our opinion about it.

Posted 2007-10-28T22:36:37Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated #12 out of 33
 
1 helpful answer

Sometimes art is absract, like our thoughts. Just like the author, the artist is dead, and art is there for our interpretation. Going to far, crossing borders, etc, is just a matter of interpretation, I think.

Posted 2007-11-16T02:06:46Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated #13 out of 33
 
1 helpful answer

I sympathise with Shima. It strikes me that much that passes for art is either a total con. trick or the work of someone who perceives that he or she can only gain funds or achieve some fame by pushing the boundaries as far as they can get away with it. The trouble is that viewers are taken in, and thus a cult is built round that so-called artist, who often uses sociological tripe to make it all sound respectable.  It's the Emperor's clothes syndrome; you feel you dare not criticise out of fear of being regarded as - in my case a reactionary old codger!



Shima, be bold, say what you honestly feel, and to blazes with those who are so easily taken in. I was at an art exhibition once where there was simply nothing that was (in my view) worthy of space. One person approached me and asked which exhibit I enjoyed most. Somewhat glibly, I replied "The Exit sign" - unaware that he was the artist! My guess is that twenty years from now this deluded artist will either have made a good reputation and income out of conning people, or will have come to his senses and do something meaningful for society. Wink

Posted 2007-11-21T18:22:54Z
 
I censor myself selectively.

Art is all about making a statement.  Censorship still happens, yes.  But many a thing can be said, and many different interpretations can be had from a single piece of art.  A thousand words cannot fully encompass what one wants to share with the world sometimes- and the full beauty of art is that it allows that effective communication to happen.

while yes, there will be times where I won't care for someone's work, that's everyone and everything.

what i love about art is the things that can be said without saying anything at all.   revel in the spaces in between.

Posted 2007-11-22T14:46:41Z
 
geegee
(deleted account)

No, I do not believe that everything is acceptable. Art is a fickle cultural entity, however, and what often most think ridiculous and hate, others love. Art is always in the eyes of the beholder. There is some great art that has intrinsic value to mankind and gives much pleasure and there is junk that a few consider art, that is just positively trash.

Posted 2009-06-13T10:24:34Z
 
2 helpful answers

Art is too subjective to place boundries around it, one of the reasons it is such a special medium. Andy Warhol said it best; "Art is whatever you can get away with." Though, there are many art critics and laypeople who feel qualified to place limits on art...I do not think art can be defined except through the eyes of the beholder.

Posted 2009-06-17T22:43:52Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Shima? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Pop Art a pivotal point

"How did pop art serve to be a pivotal point for the future of art?"
Submitted by Snickers_37   2 years ago.
  • viewed 660 times
Last answer posted 4 hours ago by wxm


Q:

Mandalas as art healing?

Why are mandala considered a good art healing tool?
Submitted by Dazzlecat   10 months ago.
  • viewed 390 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by bonestructure


Q:

Arts and crafts store

where can I find an arts and crafts store handling acrylic paints, paint brushes and glitter?
Submitted by vsmith470   27 days ago.
  • viewed 198 times
Last answer posted 4 days ago by doulaiiiiiii



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Arts, culture, recreation and attractions resources

Following is a list of resources for arts, culture and attractions in the Louisville metropolitan First Friday Gallery/Trolley Hop Art Sanctuary Louisville Film Society Kino Louisville Ed Hamilton yet another link to Notes: LEO's music blog .Even though it's mentioned in the "Performing arts

The Collective Culture - is it fracturing? (The Art of G

Arisen about the tradition of anonymous giving both to charity and arts. I brought up to the realization that giving for its own sake is for the good of the collective culture.I also think that what is "good" for society

What is art in our society???

In our society and can there be an improvement of some sort? People who walk with their eyes open As a contemporary fine art student i really battled to come into terms with the standard of art for appreciation sake to arts festivals. Have more staff like the Kuru festival- you can have different types
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Answers
  • Web
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners · CC License